Mike and Borz unpack the invisible phylactery over the pitfalls of psychological language, the latest Axios nonsense about a Trump and Bibi fallout, and take apart Nathan Robinson's article speaking over Palestinian voices.
/
RSS Feed
Eh, no Mike. The rightoids that “believe the scripture” go to church and that community is their life, but they don’t read the Bible for the most part and their evangelical pastor is the one that feeds them the Israel worship slop.
Michigander is pretty bad but once again Canada has out-gayed you with the term Torontonian.
What if the kikeslave consents?
I think Don jr. Was married to a jew but divorced
I wouldn’t discount the Kennedy nuclear theory. Ben Gurion resigned because of Kennedy’s pressure. Gurion also said that limiting Israeli military capability would result in another Holocaust.
Around the 1:15:00 mark where you guys talk about the discourse about what country controls who, I think MelGibsonAfter4Beers has summarized this issue succintly:
Trump is not a raped kike slave, he’s Kenboy on his birthday.
So the isreal kike was trying to scam Trump with a fake birther video and then sell another scam to mainstream news media? And this is somehow okay because the scam failed?
Hey maybe hating Israel is something you and your father can reconnect over Mike.
Curtis Darvin
“monomania” is not a mental state neither is hyperfocus, the words you are looking for are hypo and hypertenacity as well as hypo and hypervigillance, and these break down attetion into tenacity (attention ‘spread out’ through time, i.e being able to go through with tasks) and vigillance (attention spread out through space, i e being aware of surroundings)
Mike doing a classic mike moment “ackshualleeeeh, I really feel sometimes like I am kind of a psychopath 😈😈😈” never stops being funny, he even reverts back to his shitlib vocal fry accent
The Jews will have compromat on Trump. Whether or not they have needed to use it is a different question.
You guys might appreciate this. It’s from Thomas Dalton’s edition of the Protocols, page 103: “The people feel a particular love and admiration towards the clever politician, and they always react to their criminal acts as follows: “Yes, of course it is villainy, but how clever! It is a swindle, but cleverly done! So majestic! So impudent!””. So basically, but that’s just smart, posting.
He called them Roy Cohn’s three rules for winning. They were something like: Deny everything, always attack and never admit defeat. He also had all the rooms in his house surveilled so that he could get compromat.