I know for a fact my original comment was in a response to the ‘Strike and Mike’ post — yet it is been stripped of its essential words (it was an extensive reply about Christianity and its suppression of the Roman Empire circa 300 AD), to which you (Spam Houston — and I recall precisely) responded to my reply that it should belong to the Borzoi article/prize.

Here is the truncated rebuttal (no longer visible in its original form — I recall distinctively this!):

https://therightstuff.biz/2020/09/08/strike-mike-episode-128-impossible-trump-steaks/#comment-303981

Borzoi/Spam Houston:

I must apologize to the TRS comments’ section. I finally found the comment–for Borzoi to examine–as he marked with a question mark; and what I’ve remarked about Spam Houston’s response is accurate in the sense it belongs on a Borzoi thread: I was telling the truth. Here it is for those who very left hanging on (Again my apologies for the confusion):

https://therightstuff.biz/2020/09/03/ftn-339-zoomer-doom/#comment-302796

We had some disagreements about Christianity and its doctrines. I posted my initial thoughts about the treachary of Christianity (and how it was a complelety jewish en devour (gay op) from its inception through the “revelations”, miracles and belfiefs in fictional characters — who have little to no basis in historical timeline as provided by proof — as preached by Paul (a devoted Pharisee jew); to which you responded that my comment (response) would be a better fit in a Borzoi thread! Those who recall my sharp memory know what I am talking about and that it took place on… Read more »

Would you not appreciate a new breath of knowledge on the matter at hand? I would only hope to help those who have a willingness to learn — or at the very least a conceptual idea of how to seek knowledge (as opposed to propaganda). If that satisfies your misgiving (and you should possess those in full compliment to your thoughts) then I am delighted to have breached these boundaries. If, on the other hand, you are not yet moved, do continue reading my comments, They are very instructive — more so than that of the fictional “jesus”. The truth… Read more »

Fine, Chuck it up to a ? a misunderstanding…but by doing so you perhaps missed what you people call “the shot”! Being a curious person myself I would NEVER let myself fall into such a position. No matter the commentary about such exaltation (in the eyes of some), it nonetheless becomes a necessity, a quench of intellectual curisoty (assuming one is accustomed to its requisite challenges) — to pursue said assertions to their logical conclusions. Only after continued contact can one gleam into/unto the intentions of said commentators; yet until such an opinion can be justified then one shoulld examine… Read more »