Welcome to Episode 127 of STRIKE and MIKE. Strike and Mike discuss the problem that Democrats are having with reigning in Antifa rioters, Albert Lindemann's critique of Jewish historiography in Esau's Tears, how Jewish inability for self-criticism creates problems for them, how intransigent anti-White narrative building has made it impossible to control Antifa, and the failing attempt by Republicans to divert White anger into Chinklethink.
Get behind the paywall to access the show!
- Antifa riots and murders: Democrats increasingly see them as a liability
- Discussion on Esau's Tears by Albert Lindemann
- Jewish historiography: self-indulgence and inability for objective self-criticism
- Liberal inability to reign in Antifa as a product of Jewish intransigence
- Chinklethink
Theme music: "Witchburner" by Storm King
I was reading along with Striker in the epilogue and I noticed something odd. Lindemann bashes holocaust “deniers” as having “no following among serious scholars” and says their claims are “transparently bogus to anyone familiar with the field.” But if you check the footnote for that sentence, Lindemann refers the reader to … Deborah Lipstadt’s book. Wuuuut? Lipstadt is like a Dawidowicz clone except probably worse. She’s like the platonic form of everything he’s criticizing. And he has to know that. On the surface he’s giving this over-the-top denunciation of the deniers but then he gives an (intentionally?) bad citation.… Read more »
The Klarsfelds who published the Pressac book were very strong Zionist Nazi-hunter super-Jew types. Not sure why they published the book. It was in the aftermath of the Zundel trial/Leuchter and I think they felt like they needed a more serious response than the usual ad hominem smears. They might have just wanted an impressive looking tome out there that they could point to as having “debunked” the fact checkers. But they don’t seem to have intended for people to actually read the thing. There weren’t that many copies printed and it retailed for around $100. I get the sense… Read more »
Funny how in that response to Lindemann that Mike read the reviewer concedes that all the popular Jewish historians like Dawidowicz, Goldhagen, and Martin Gilbert are ethnocentric hacks. That is a MAJOR concession. Martin Gilbert after all is the OFFICIAL Churchill biographer and was given exclusive access to many records.
Also, as far as the more serious stuff being more “nuanced,” that may be partly true, but I’m skeptical that it’s that much better. Andrew Joyce has said he was red-pilled mostly by reading Jewish academic historians and noticing that it was nothing more than Jewish apologia.