The Right Stuff

Precisely like a Jew. This was the first time I’ve ever heard a (presumably) non-Jew do so. “The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their tactics in debate. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out, they played the trick of acting the innocent simpleton. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter-arguments and feeling themselves cornered, hastily transferred the discussion to another field. They uttered truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, took this acceptance as applying to other problems and matters differing essentially from the original theme. If you cornered them on this point they would escape again, and you could not force them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried, to get a firm grip on any of these apostles, one’s hand grasped only a slimy jelly which slipped through the fingers, but coagulated again a moment afterwards. If your arguments were so telling that your adversary felt forced to give in on account of those listening and if you then… Read more »

Anglo af tbh fam.

“You can have an ethnostate of one white person, guys. “

I couldn’t decide whether to piss my pants laughing at this or put my fist through my computer monitor.

Fuck Sargon. This was the first and last time I’ve ever listen to this conceited, pseudo-intellectual, slippery, very evasive, elitist snob and first-class “arse”, as the British say.

“Give your shekels to the Jew, goy! It’ll be funny!”

[*disdainful glare intensifies*]

“Sargon wants to use state power against those who refuse to bake the gay cake. “

“Gay” is a euphemism. More fitting is “queer cake.”

Its very peculiar, that interpretation, because Superman DOESN’T save society, not really.
A threat emerges, Superman defeats it, but rarely DESTROYS it, meaning its a temporary victory. And then the threat emerges once again, at some point in the future. This pattern repeats itself across comics, again and again and again, its basically a trope, and while some interpret it as a ploy to keep the plotlines going, I’ve oft seen it presented, in the comics, as a matter of morality.
I always found it a bizarre morality that the comics push, in-line with Trudea-styled “If you kill your enemies, they win!” shit. Batman is the most-commonly cited offender in this context, but Superman is also quite guilty of that pattern.

@New Castle: Bro, you totally can though! In fact, what’s funny about the film franchises is that they often don’t espouse that aspect of the comic universe shit – they kill peole all the time, with purpose! While, in comics, it seems to mostly be like something that just sort of happens, by accident or circumstance, and in some storylines its even a point of moral hardship for the heroes to be dealing with the fact that, in fact, when they killed their enemies, their enemies died and no longer caused the same problems over and over again!
Also you did exactly what I described – trying to ply it off as a plot-device – while ignoring what I said about how its portrayed in the comics themselves, in-universe, as a moral matter. Am I wrong? Did Superman used to kill his enemies in the comics, did Batman, before the trope had developed?

“I don’t find the concept Jewish!”… he says, about a concept literally created by Jews.
Also:
“Superman, the all-powerful being, needs to relax, goy!”
Superman should just take over the world. Its only in these Jewish comics that these ridiculous characters choose to exist in this constant state of conflict, which is a common critique of basically all of them, particularly Batman and Superman types.
These people could simply kill their super villain enemies, and not have this shit continually happening… But because they’re the creations of Jews, somehow, its more moral to NOT kill their enemies, to let them live, only for them to do the same thing again 4 months later.
This is exactly the sort of Jewish morality being pushed on people which was discussed.
I mean, dude, this is basically the same morality which says we can’t deport niggers and muds for all the wrong-doing on their behalf as a group!
Star Wars. Was. Never. Good.

Galvatron, they added their own flavor to it, and you didn’t address any of the other points raised.
Also, from the wikiJew on this ‘Gladiator’:
“Though she hates him, she does not leave him, and they instead raise their son to be respectful of his incredible gift and sternly instruct him never to fight, or otherwise reveal his gifts, lest he be the target of a witch-hunt.”
Superman has no fear of such. He’s fucking totally invulnerable. There is no weapon at the disposal of humanity which can really harm him.
In Gladiator, it kinda made sense, but in Superman, it doesn’t, at all.
ALSO, from the wikiJew on the author:
“The book delves into the double standards between men and women that existed prior the woman’s movement of the 1970s, exploring the nature of the relationship between men and women and the issues of women’s rights and homosexuality.”
Go ahead and look at his book ‘Triumph’ and tell me if you don’t see the shadow of the Jew in this man’s ideals.

Remember, originally, Superman did not even know he was an alien, and when he found out in the comics, it was not until around 12 years into his publication history, and many years into his career as Superman and as an adult. He isn’t pretending to be Clark Kent, as far as he is concerned, he IS Clark Kent, the costumed Superman persona and mild mannered reporter disguises are both things he created and pretends to be. He has the Superman identity as a public performing identity a kin to a fireman, designed to be instantly recognizable, like a flag, and he pretends to be a mild mannered reporter so he cam get access to situations that need his attention the most as Superman. Being an alien was always just the excuse for the superpowers in the original stories, nothing else. Not the morality, worldview, costume, S shield, etc. Those things all came from being Clark, and being Clark had everything to do with being human, specifically an midwestern american. Originally, Superman was not even an alien, but a highly evolved human from the future, sent back in time by his wise scientist dad as a baby to escape earth’s… Read more »

John Byrne said that Hitler would have loved Siegel & Shuster’s version of Krypton – a race of highly evolved super people..

Thing is, none of them do anything different.
They repeat the same talking points and argumentative strategies, and it never goes anywhere. Its circular, which is what’s going to create a real fatigue if this keeps up. You can only hear an effeminate man spew the same faggotry so many times before it loses its zest.

*necks