The standard boilerplate that has lately been spewing out of the mouths of ignorant westerners is that “IS is unIslamic,” an extension of the argument that Jihadists are somehow “hijacking” Islam and then “twisting” it to their purposes.
Now it is true that a significant body of Orthodox Sunni Islam, theologically centered on Saudi Arabia (The Land of the Two Holy Mosques) and Egypt (home of Al-Azhar University) rejects the legitimacy of the Islamic State. These disputes are legalistic in nature, regarding whether or not IS have the divine sanction necessary to make their state and Jihad religiously legitimate.
Let’s talk about anarchy for a moment. Which kind of anarchy? Anarcho-capitalism? Anarcho-syndicalism? Anarcho-primitivism? Anarcho-communism? Anarcha-feminism? Gee wilikers, there sure are a buttload of reasons to get rid of the state, huh? Apparently, getting rid of the state will lead to a completely free, environmentally sustainable, feminist, worker-controlled, capitalistic, tribal (yet advanced), communistic land that will organize itself quite nicely. After all, what good does the state ever do? It taxes you (murderously rapes you with a gun to your head), enforces property rights (rapes and steals from you with a gun to your head), enforces a system of capitalistic exploitation (forces you into slavery with a gun to your head), and forces business owners to work within a specific market frame (steals, rapes, and exploits them with a gun to their head).
Earlier this week, traitor and psychopath “Buffalo Bill” Manning was sentenced to serve between seven and thirty-five years at Ft. Leavenworth prison for leaking government secrets. These secrets reveal that our country does, in fact, conduct war and diplomacy.
Attentionwhore progressives have begun the process of formally canonizing this treasonous tranny; the process will likely be fast-tracked due to his trendy sexual issues. In fact, a super-duper brave Icelandic dyke has gone so far as to nominate PFC Tuck-dick for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Don’t get me wrong, I detest nanny-statism with every fiber of my being. The modern statist is the consequence of post enlightenment ideals. After all government (not the same thing as The State) that serves the people can only corrode the people. With that being said, Anti-Statists are in the wrong about a very useful institution.
If governments are institutions that possess the chains for the masses, The State possesses the whips for the masses. Violence isn’t a necessary evil, nor is it a malleable accident. It’s a neutral force that only has moral substance in what it’s being used for. The same goes for The State. Statism is an excellent device not only for defensive purposes, but also for ambitious ones. It’s about time we start seeing The West return to its imperial passions instead of this globalist, egalitarian knock-off.
That passion still remains, as we use the iron hands of The State to destroy our own wealth. Unfortunately, this only compels those that remain faithful to the spirit of The West to fantasize of The Happening, NWO Martial Law, Armageddon, A race war, A failed economic state, even a zombie apocalypse. That’s the new Western fantasy. When the iron hands of violence (The State) aren’t appropriated for good, the good will want it gone.
In my previous post “Nerdism and Property” I revealed my thoughts on NAP, Prime-Directive, and Formalistic jargon. I neglected to tackle the White Nationalist motto of “Whites for white nations, Blacks for Black Nations, and Asians for Asian Nations.” While I still have my nationalistic sympathies, all these principles unrealistically neglect that might makes right. No, the U.S. making Somalia its colony isn’t advantageous or intelligent, but there are places that I can think of that are.
Let me begin by stating that I believe everyone reading this article will at least share my desire for a more orderly and prosperous society than what currently exists in the West today. With that said, my criticisms and considerations are mainly directed at libertarians.
I should preface that I myself have been a libertarian since 2007 or so. I supported Ron Paul in 2008 and would have liked to have seen him get the GOP nomination at least in 2012. Besides that I have read, watched and studied libertarian ideology since then, so don’t believe a return criticism that can be leveled at me is, “he just doesn’t understand libertarianism!” In fact, it is my understanding of the subject that informs these criticisms.
Libertarians desire a society that has more personal liberty, economic freedom and less “nanny state” molestation of the individual. These are indeed admirable goals, but their ways of achieving these are mistaken. Many think this can be done through either nonviolence and the non-aggression principle, or a sort of Fabian philosophical drift.
Seeing nothing new under the sun, I’ve come to think, as The Joker put it, “that is the one rule you’ll have to break to know the truth.” To paraphrase him, the only sensible way to live in this world and achieve your goals is not through the absence of rules(ers), but by not allowing everyone to decide on the rules.
A good frenemy of mine recently pointed out that we here at The Right Stuff should not take ourselves so seriously all the time. I find myself agreeing. I fucking love to hate you, Suss.
Sometimes, things get a bit too esoteric and combative both at the blog and our secret online forums/moon base. Even a Darwinian Ultra-Royalist like myself can become drained by the constant critique and debate. There are simply too many people who need to go fuck themselves. It makes one’s head spin.
While our work continues to attract considerable interest, the fact remains that Western society is not at a point where TRS propaganda can be put into practice. ‘Murca is simply not austere enough for it’s Golden Dawn. Yet.
Until me and my black shirts are introducing Occupussy skulls to truncheons, it’s certainly rational for one to afford a few moments of unguarded humor.
Which brings me to the subject for today’s Reactionary whimsy.
Here at The Right Stuff we’re always tearing things down and burning bridges. I figured I’d try to write a hopeful article that reaches out to potential right-wing allies and proposes a solution — an article with a positive vision for change. Well, at least it’s as positive as one can be in an article that recommends interning large groups of Americans. I see a potential alliance and compatibility between occidental traditionalists and libertarians. Maybe this is a bridge too far, but it’s really the only way forward for the right.
Creativity, innovation, free actors, decentralization, free markets — it’s all great stuff. This point is granted; spontaneous order is the best. But not always. Sometimes there are extenuating circumstances.
Drastic measures are required. We’re too far gone now. A small elite always rules over the herd, and this elite has the power to mold public opinion. We must become the elite, by any means necessary. Martial law is probably required, and that means the imposition of a fascist leader’s arbitrary will.