“No enemies to the right” is a good motto to live by but what does one do when those to the right of you see you as the enemy? Paranoid behavior is a hallmark of the left. It manifests itself in the leftist singularity or as Camus puts it, “Every revolutionary ends up either becoming an oppressor or a heretic.”
The left always devours itself. It isn’t exactly surprising that leftists always end up putting paranoid and psychopathic mass-murdering dictators in power. It’s predictable.
To see such behavior on the far right is something else altogether. It becomes pathological when those who would otherwise see themselves as reactionaries attempting to reassert or regain their power suddenly take on the psychology of the powerless radical leftist.
Here we have what passes for dialectic in this country. Tradition vs. Progress. Old vs. New. Stupid Faith vs. Smart Faith. I’m not surprised to learn this deep, meaningful debate was covered by Good Morning America. This is the Liberal Cat Lady’s catnip.
…But what does “Christian” mean in this context? Is the Partridge family really taking a stand against our decadent and secular culture? Are they really taking up the cross and following the Lord in a meaningful fashion? Let’s take a look at their blogs:
Umm…. You seem to have forgotten to capitalize “God” there, Veronica. LOL, whoopsie.
It’s been an eventful year and a half for pedophiles and their apologists everywhere. We had Lena Dunham admit to seducing her toddler sister to the applause of many liberal defenders, fans cheered on left-libertarian (aren’t they all?) Brad Spangler after he openly admitted to molesting his own daughter and possessing child porn, and of course some suspicious and respected individuals (hint) have tried to claim that pedophilia is a mere sexual preference. Are these incidents of cheerleading for chimos just isolated anomalies? Well, it would be a shame not to cover a particular under-the-radar story that was transmitted out of several cells of pedophilia mainstreaming. NAMBLA and 8Chan? No, try popular liberal media sources.
Addendum: I was acquainted with Spangler in 2011, when he would have been considered ancap. I have changed the title of this article from “anarcho-capitalist” to “left-libertarian,” to more-correctly reflect his current political affiliation.
Sincere Warning:What follows is a serious confession of aberrant and vile human behavior. I advise my readers not to read the following article in too negative a frame of mind.
Things like this make me seriously question things like laws and human rights.
A while ago, I came across an “article” of sorts in which some worthless, smug-faced hipster faggot mocked what he referred to as “the sad white astronaut” trope commonly found in science fiction movies. Oh, you mean that trope where people who are lost in the great unknown fighting for the good of humanity have the cognitive capacity to understand how alienating and terrifying that is? Sounds hysterical.
Let’s get something straight here, this isn’t about mocking science fiction, as this effeminate little tumblrite probably spends hours a day writing Doctor Who fan fiction, or simply mocking accomplishment itself. This is about harboring guilt for the accomplishments of Whitey, because Whitey gets shit done like no other group can. As we already know, this fact gives liberals sad feelz for killing The Narrative, and nothing quite says master race like being able to transcend outer-fucking-space.
Here at TRS, we are always scanning the rhetorical horizons in an effort to keep America safe and prosperous. Language holds the keys to the kingdom, and how we define words often dictates our reactions. This is the primary reason that political correctness is a pox upon our house. Often, this redefining is offensive to the sensibilities of most citizens, and serves only to further the “progressive” ideas of small, deviant sections of the populace.
Away from the prying eyes of America, liberal academia has been busy scheming over one such subversion: the legitimization of pedophilia.
I’ll forego the snarky introduction for this one. Let’s get down to responding to quotes from this author’s “traditional” abandonment of his people and culture.
Westerners don’t “get” Muslims. We’re descended from the barbarian tribes (Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Franks, Visigoths, Vandals, etc) that destroyed the western Roman empire, we have a tendency to reflexively hate and attack that which we don’t understand.
Modern, cosmopolitan Western Civilization is descended from and influenced by barbarians at some point in the past. This means that Westerns are probably not going to be very understanding of a foreign culture and faith that is commanded to submit the world.
No, that’s seriously the premise. OH BOY.
We have only just begun. We will soon discover that the author intends to argue that the best way to combat the modern corruption of the West’s altruism towards outgroups… Is to have more altruism when it comes to a particular outgroup.
It never ceases to amaze me to see the lengths women will go to signal status and achieve what they believe to be a higher place in feminism’s trivial pecking order.
The CNN article begins with Mrs. Theresa Corbin’s early life, being totally repulsed by the intellectual barrenness and sexism of Catholicism (lol cool story). The author would spend four years “poking and prodding at world religions and their adherents”(READ: drum circles and exotic boyfriends), before settling for the hijab.
She is vague on specifics, but ultimately converted to Islam two months after 9/11… For reasons totally unrelated to politics I’m sure.