Let me begin by stating that I believe everyone reading this article will at least share my desire for a more orderly and prosperous society than what currently exists in the West today. With that said, my criticisms and considerations are mainly directed at libertarians.
I should preface that I myself have been a libertarian since 2007 or so. I supported Ron Paul in 2008 and would have liked to have seen him get the GOP nomination at least in 2012. Besides that I have read, watched and studied libertarian ideology since then, so don’t believe a return criticism that can be leveled at me is, “he just doesn’t understand libertarianism!” In fact, it is my understanding of the subject that informs these criticisms.
Libertarians desire a society that has more personal liberty, economic freedom and less “nanny state” molestation of the individual. These are indeed admirable goals, but their ways of achieving these are mistaken. Many think this can be done through either nonviolence and the non-aggression principle, or a sort of Fabian philosophical drift.
Seeing nothing new under the sun, I’ve come to think, as The Joker put it, “that is the one rule you’ll have to break to know the truth.” To paraphrase him, the only sensible way to live in this world and achieve your goals is not through the absence of rules(ers), but by not allowing everyone to decide on the rules.
NOT PICTURED: a cock or hamburger (same thing) in this liberal’s mouth.
It is a close-enough representation nonetheless.
BTW, the hamster pictured above relocated to the cranium after first being placed up the liberal host’s ass. True story. Don’t judge him, you fucking oppressor.
FACT: A true right-winger will be nearly indistinguishable from an internet troll at first blush.
- Leftism (liberalism) seeks the enervation and eventual destruction of human existence.
- Actual Rightism (Reaction) ultimately desires authority.
- Any idea or movement that ceases promoting authority will always, ultimately collapse into leftism.
These are important, fundamental principles I believe my fellow reactionaries and anti-liberals need to internalize, lest we find ourselves following the same unfortunate (and predictable) path of the libertarian movement.
(Give it two more years, and PorcFest will be identical to an Occupussy rally.)
Accepting the axioms above requires that one re-align their understanding of historical narrative. For instance…
Aberrant societies like the Soviet Union are not par for the liberal course. In fact, leftist memes rotted the authoritarian, inherently right-wing Communist state from the inside-out. Gorbachev was not a Lenin or Stalin, and the Soviet Union that fell was not the Soviet Union that was willing to holodomor and gulag and purge to achieve it’s ends (partly why it fell in the first place).
(Yes, it is laughably retarded when people call themselves “Communist” while promoting liberal emptiness. Libertarians make better use of the Marxian dialectic, imho.)
It makes little sense expecting liberalism to logically result in Fascism or Communism. I mean seriously, who expects a Stalin or Hitler to emerge from the feministing bitches and their fat, cucked, neckbearded betas?
Authority, power, domination is the desired outcome of a sane society, and only collapses when it is poisoned by liberalism’s perverted worship of all things weak and pathetic.
In contrast, the left’s end goal is human extinction. All liberalism’s talk of oppression and equality, and their condemnation of the evils of privilege results in this embrace of death.
You value your identity more than the immigrant stranger? OPPRESSIVE FASH!
At first, it seems an impossible task: taking a social program that is in many ways the central pillar for modern liberalism, and re-appropriating it for productive use in a society both myself and reality is more in favor of (the reactionary, anti-liberal, bad boy society your mommy warned you about).
But at The Right Stuff we take manly pride in defending the undefendable and promoting the unpromotable… If for no other reason than it’s more entertaining than hearing about “free markets” or “oppression” for the millionth time.
In this article, I will show how an aristocratic society can transform THIS:
…With some purposeful social engineering, and the patience to wait one generation for results.
Long, long ago…
Some Jew in a bow tie told me not to trust the Statist. The Statist, he said, would lie and deceive me. The Statist was only interested in my wealth, so that he could redistribute it to his asshole friends while I wallowed in ignorance and squalor.
Thankful for the advice, I gave him and his knowledgeable friends a lot of my money in exchange for their pretty books. Despite the fact the majority of these books were copies of the good ones, and the good ones re-hashed the bow-tie wearing Jew’s three sentences of advice, the works were well-bound, and looked super sexy in my bookcase. It never got me laid, but you never know, right?
Anyway, thanks to myself and other appreciative folks like me, the people who sold me these books now can afford to have a lot of educational events and host web space where their professors conduct online lectures that reinforce what their books say (though at a price I could never really afford). They also wear bow ties.