Tag Archives: Anarchy

An Apostate On Libertarians

by | 12 Replies

3t5jw8Let me begin by stating that I believe everyone reading this article will at least share my desire for a more orderly and prosperous society than what currently exists in the West today. With that said, my criticisms and considerations are mainly directed at libertarians.

I should preface that I myself have been a libertarian since 2007 or so. I supported Ron Paul in 2008 and would have liked to have seen him get the GOP nomination at least in 2012. Besides that I have read, watched and studied libertarian ideology since then, so don’t believe a return criticism that can be leveled at me is, “he just doesn’t understand libertarianism!” In fact, it is my understanding of the subject that informs these criticisms.

Libertarians desire a society that has more personal liberty, economic freedom and less “nanny state” molestation of the individual. These are indeed admirable goals, but their ways of achieving these are mistaken. Many think this can be done through either nonviolence and the non-aggression principle, or a sort of Fabian philosophical drift.

Seeing nothing new under the sun, I’ve come to think, as The Joker put it, “that is the one rule you’ll have to break to know the truth.” To paraphrase him, the only sensible way to live in this world and achieve your goals is not through the absence of rules(ers), but by not allowing everyone to decide on the rules.

Continue reading →

The Tragedy Of Objectivism

by | 7 Replies

NothingnessWithout a Geist, there is no Zeit.

Objectivism, to me, is an ideology best compared to a brilliant child reared in a broken home.  Good genetics, poor environment.  What beauty results is forever crippled by the realization of what could have been.

Many today are content with simply bashing the Objectivist ideology; it is my intent to present to you, dear reader, a more somber narrative.  This is because, to me, there exists no modern ideology more incomplete, and therefore more tragic, than this one.

Continue reading →

Lol, Individualism

by | 3 Replies

“…The Americans’ ‘open-mindedness’, which is sometimes cited in their favor, is the other side of their interior formlessness.  The same goes for their ‘individualism’. Individualism and personality are not the same: the one belongs to the formless world of quantity, the other to the world of quality and hierarchy. The Americans are the living refutation of the Cartesian axiom, “I think, therefore I am”: Americans do not think, yet they are. The American ‘mind’, puerile and primitive, lacks characteristic form and is therefore open to every kind of standardization” – Julius Evola

I am non-aggression, therefore marijuana.

Individualism is a formless quantity, like water.  The individual man can thus be seen as a single droplet.

Continue reading →

Bulbasaur’s Three Principles

by | 5 Replies
  1. Leftism (liberalism) seeks the enervation and eventual destruction of human existence.
  2. Actual Rightism (Reaction) ultimately desires authority.
  3. Any idea or movement that ceases promoting authority will always, ultimately collapse into leftism.

These are important, fundamental principles I believe my fellow reactionaries and anti-liberals need to internalize, lest we find ourselves following the same unfortunate (and predictable) path of the libertarian movement.

(Give it two more years, and PorcFest will be identical to an Occupussy rally.)

Accepting the axioms above requires that one re-align their understanding of historical narrative.  For instance…

Aberrant societies like the Soviet Union are not par for the liberal course.  In fact, leftist memes rotted the authoritarian, inherently right-wing Communist state from the inside-out.  Gorbachev was not a Lenin or Stalin, and the Soviet Union that fell was not the Soviet Union that was willing to holodomor and gulag and purge to achieve it’s ends (partly why it fell in the first place).

(Yes, it is laughably retarded when people call themselves “Communist” while promoting liberal emptiness.  Libertarians make better use of the Marxian dialectic, imho.)

It makes little sense expecting liberalism to logically result in fascism or Communism.  I mean seriously, who expects a Stalin or Hitler to emerge from the feministing bitches and their fat, cucked, neckbearded betas?

Authority, power, domination is the desired outcome of a sane society, and only collapses when it is poisoned by liberalism’s perverted worship of all things weak and pathetic.

In contrast, the left’s end goal is human extinction.  All liberalism’s talk of oppression and equality, and their condemnation of the evils of privilege results in this embrace of death.

BNP

You value your identity more than the immigrant stranger? OPPRESSIVE FASH!