<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Right Stuff]]></title><description><![CDATA[Your rational world is a circle-jerk.]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/</link><generator>Ghost 0.11</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:26:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://therightstuff.biz/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[THE DAILY SHOAH #117: Decolonizing The Current Year]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The latest episode of your 2nd favorite Republican fake radio show is available over at <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/12/28/tds117-decolonizing-the-current-year/">Radio.TheRightStuff.Biz</a>. Enjoy!</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/28/the-daily-shoah-117-decolonizing-the-current-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">cfd15004-93dd-42a7-89be-c183e2929ceb</guid><category><![CDATA[The Daily Shoah]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seventh Son]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 14:44:41 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/TDS3VERTxmas.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/TDS3VERTxmas.png" alt="THE DAILY SHOAH #117: Decolonizing The Current Year"><p>The latest episode of your 2nd favorite Republican fake radio show is available over at <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/12/28/tds117-decolonizing-the-current-year/">Radio.TheRightStuff.Biz</a>. Enjoy!</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Brickbats and the Lying Rat Pack]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest submission by author Mundil Fury. - JS</em></p>

<p>It would be funny if Donald Trump and Conrad Black starred in a <em>Dukes of Hazzard</em>-esque buddy caper in which they roared around in their souped-up muscle car cleverly thwarting their degenerate enemies. Or maybe they could pile</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/27/untitled-18/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">73254704-7804-4e4a-8e10-5e93ebe300b0</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 23:21:57 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest submission by author Mundil Fury. - JS</em></p>

<p>It would be funny if Donald Trump and Conrad Black starred in a <em>Dukes of Hazzard</em>-esque buddy caper in which they roared around in their souped-up muscle car cleverly thwarting their degenerate enemies. Or maybe they could pile into a van with Ann Coulter, Lana Lokteff, and Emily Youcis, et. al., and drive around the world solving mysteries. I’m not sure who the Shaggy-like hippy character would be yet. On second thought, let’s leave him out altogether. Henrik Palmgren would be the perfect stand-in for a Viking-like Freddy. Perhaps Scooby-Doo could be played by <a href="https://redice.tv/news/trump-nominates-retired-marine-general-james-mattis-as-secretary-of-defense">General James “Mad Dog” Mattis</a> who would motivate the Scooby Gang and exalt in the annihilation of assorted monsters as he personally called down heavy ordnance.  Mad Dog would be rewarded with MRE Scooby Snacks and hastily prepared <a href="https://youtu.be/cRIriU1ApVc">combat coffee</a> (Canadian soldiers are featured in this combat coffee making tutorial, but you get the idea). “I would’ve controlled Fallujah, too, if it weren’t for you pesky kids!” a particularly swarthy monster would yell as he was dragged off by the military police. Or maybe Trump and his pal Conrad could be running away from a posse of metapolitical enforcers led by Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch. “Who are these guys?!” Trump would admiringly declare à la <em>Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid</em> as they leapt into a raging river torrent.</p>

<p>That’s pie-in-the-sky LARPing, I know, but it was interesting to see Conrad Black, a high profile Trump loyalist, support his friend (maybe friend is too strong a word? Colleague? Compatriot?) in Canada’s <em>National Post</em> newspaper. The content farm is a verdant place these days, and Conrad Black did not disappoint. I know Black has had his own series of setbacks, triumphs, and follies over the years: his failed history Ph.D.; calling a diminutive Cultural Marxist historian a “little twerp” (for the record I thought this was especially apt and hilarious); marrying Barbara Amiel; being the subject of at least one unauthorized biography; a stay in prison; and other hilarious shenanigans. But I digress.</p>

<p>In his <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/conrad-black-more-delusions-of-canadian-grandeur-follow-trump-election">recent article</a> about the God-Emperor, Conrad Black observed that during his run for president, Trump “pointed to the press sections on multiple occasions at his heavily attended campaign rallies and drew down on them crescendos of brickbats and fist-shaking hostility.” A bit of hyperbole to be sure, but in Black’s mind, justified. For Black himself goes on to write that the media in the United States and Canada were “exposed as impotent stooges of the Clinton-Bush-Obama <em>vieux jeu…</em>” The mainstream media (hereafter MSM) acted throughout the campaign like a “swarm of bugs that ha[d] just been blasted with insecticide.” The MSM’s penchant for falsehood has been commented on astutely by members of the Alt Right for some time now, and they’ve been right all along. Baron Black of Crossharbour is (almost) on the same page in that particular regard.  As far as the professional bankruptcy of Canada’s MSM is concerned, Black emphasizes that it suffers from a similar malaise afflicting its American counterpart:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>“I found myself a few days ago listening with slack-jawed incredulity while two former Canadian ambassadors in the Middle East and a pompous Anglo-Canadian academic historian expressed the hope that Justin Trudeau would advise the incoming foreign policy team of the Trump administration that not all of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims consider themselves to be at war with America. It was the clearest confirmation of many I have had in recent years of just how vastly more stupid our media have become…”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Despite Conrad Black’s erudite assurances, are you still having trouble trying to convince your normie friends, family, and colleagues that the mainstream <em>Lügenpresse</em> is biased beyond all reckoning? Well, have no fear, fam, Wikileaks is here.  When debating with your blue-pilled compatriots you can have some primary source substantiation in your back pocket, ready to retort with extreme prejudice. There’s a brilliant website called <a href="http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/">Most Damaging Wikileaks</a> (hereafter MDW) that has done lots of the heavy lifting for us. It’s like an online finding aid for researchers or an annotated bibliography with flare. On the subject of media corruption, collusion, and jaunisme (yellow journalism for us Anglos), this site is a veritable goldmine. In the Frequently Asked Question section (hereafter FAQ) of the MDW website, question number 5 asks rhetorically why is it that the media has barely covered the leaks? The answer is that almost 100% of mainstream media sources are implicated in the leaks. Based on the primary source evidence provided in the leaks themselves, these news sources “have conspired to get Hillary elected, by only reporting anti-Trump smear pieces, manufacturing or exaggerating scandals, and hiding anything damaging to Hillary.” Most of the news outlets implicated in the leaks even donated money to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The leaks were not being covered because CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, Politico, Huffington Post, AP, and others are all implicated in the leaks. That’s one of the reasons MSM news organizations conducted a relentless campaign of hatred against Trump (not the only reason, of course, but a major one).</p>

<p>Let us now have a look at some examples. Access MDW’s top <a href="http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/">100 list</a> and scroll down to number 35 entitled “List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.” The very fact that journalists agreed to be wined and dined is enough to set off the media collusion alarm klaxon. MDW links to four Wikileaks emails that outline some of the logistics for this comfy night with ole Hill. The <a href="https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063">first email</a> of the four is a comprehensive list of attendees (who don’t deserve tendies) of the “off the record” soiree in question at Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta’s home (aka the den of depravity).  The list includes journalists John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Maggie Haberman and others such as Diane Sawyer, George Stephanopolous, Mika Brzezinski and many others. According to the author of the MDW website, the largest number of invitees who agreed to attend the party were from the New York Times, Bloomberg, MSNBC, and CNN. But hold on there, goy, are you trying to say that this indicates corruption and a pro-Hillary bias? It’s not about me though, is it? It’s about what the documents say; and the alligator mouth is open towards “yes” in this equation. Incidentally, this dinner was held in April 2015 and the Clinton campaign’s investment in influence paid off during her run for president (in terms of fawning positive coverage that is).</p>

<p>It doesn’t end there, oh no. Number 37 on the list of the top 100 Wikileaks is entitled “The New York Times colluding with Hillary, allowed quote edits.” MDW quite rightly states that the Clinton campaign was very involved in the editing process of a <em>New York Times</em> (hereafter NYT) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/magazine/re-re-re-reintroducing-hillary-clinton.html?_r=2">interview piece</a> conducted and written by NYT reporter Mark Leibovich. In a <a href="https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213">forwarded email</a> from Jennifer Palmieri, a Hillary Clinton campaign staffer, to John Podesta, dated 10 July 2015, Palmieri provides an exchange between herself and Mark Leibovich.  Leibovich essentially gives Palmieri the option to pick and choose the sections of his interview with Hillary Clinton that he could use: “I wanted the option to use all – and you could veto what you didn’t want. That’s why I selected the 5 or 6 I sent to you…but I’d really love to use the other things I sent, too. They were all on point. Sorry for mis-communique here, but do you you [sic] think you can check?”  Palmieri replied in subsequent messages in the thread about having control over what Leibovich was to include in his article: “Uh, I thought you told me that you wanted us to pick.”  And Palmieri suggests specific edits as well: “My apologies for the delay. I finally had to get her in person. Fine to use the moose, but appreciate leaving the mention of Sarah Palin out.”  That’s collusion at its finest, in just one small example.</p>

<p>There are several instances where the NYT colluded with the Hillary machine in these leaks; an email from Brent Budowsky, a political opinion writer and blogger, sums that up quite succinctly. In <a href="https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1181">an email</a> to the then Public Editor of the NYT, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sullivan_(journalist)">Margaret M. Sullivan</a>, dated 19 May 2015, Budowsky wrote about his concerns surrounding the NYT’s coverage of the House Benghazi committee “one of the most partisan committees in memory.” Budowsky states</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>“Should the NY Times reporters be stenographers for a partisan committee, taking dictation and writing stories? And if the committee unethically leaks an email shouldn’t the NY Times give some general indication of the partisan nature of the source? And shouldn’t the NYT reporters do some legitimate reporting rather than repeating from partisan committee handouts?...The NYT should not be not [sic] having exclusive arrangements with Peter Schweizer or writing stenography-handout stories from a partisan committee. In sorrow rather than anger, Margaret, I find it sad this happens because the NYT should be different and better. Your foreign correspondents are. Your political reporting is not. Too bad.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>"Fake News" is a meme that has been seeded by the MSM Lügenpresse into the culture in a pathetic attempt at retroactive butt-coverage, it’s not going to work though, not this time. The reason for their frantic attempts at deflecting criticism from alternative news sites and independent researchers is obvious: there is a mountain of primary source evidence detailing their collusion with the Hillary Clinton campaign. The examples above, albeit significant, have barely scratched the surface of the MSM’s corruption. The rotten edifice of the anti-White Lügenpresse should be destroyed even as they try to salvage a modicum of credibility as they engage in this desperate rearguard action. Just as Daniel Friberg, president and CEO of <em>Arktos</em> media said, whilst channeling his inner Ra’s al Ghul, in his great book <a href="http://arktos.com/product/the-real-right-returns-hardback"><em>The Real Right Returns</em></a>, that the anti-White Left is in its death throes and now is the time to give it the <em>coup de grace</em>. These MSM entities are not progressive social justice warriors who have sacrificed the sanctity of the fourth estate to save humanity, they’re nothing but anti-White power wielders. Wikileaks proper and MDW can provide exceptional ammunition for the future salvoes in the war of ideas that is raging throughout our embattled civilization. If anyone can harness their power, it’s you, fam, the new ideological soldiers of the West.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Movie Review: The Neon Demon]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest submission by author J. Pound. - JS</em>
<img src="https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/QCfIu6r6Bc6VA14_C6eBYs_ijTs=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6683685/FanningNeonDemon.0.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p>Nicolas Winding Refn’s <em>The Neon Demon</em> offers a view of the Western world in uncertain times.  Elle Fanning stars as Jesse, a small town girl looking to make it big as a model in the cutthroat industry.  We</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/27/movie-review-the-neon-demon/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">0e39ded6-430d-4754-935d-b87a549dd17a</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:10:26 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest submission by author J. Pound. - JS</em>
<img src="https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/QCfIu6r6Bc6VA14_C6eBYs_ijTs=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6683685/FanningNeonDemon.0.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p>Nicolas Winding Refn’s <em>The Neon Demon</em> offers a view of the Western world in uncertain times.  Elle Fanning stars as Jesse, a small town girl looking to make it big as a model in the cutthroat industry.  We learn that she has already worked with an amateur photographer, Dean (Karl Glusman), who is looking to make his own mark.  He functions as a buoy for her, someone she can depend on while the thin vampire women try to eat her alive (literally and figuratively).</p>

<p>The film follows a strange arc.  Jesse begins as a victim, a naïve 16-year-old girl surrounded by worldly, surgically enhanced veterans.  She is thrust from the “idiocy of rural life” into the jaded and realpolitik world of L.A., where it is all about who to fuck, what plastic surgery to get, and what meals to skip to get to the next level, with little concern for one’s own well-being or that of others.  She fakes her parent’s signature to get her start in the industry, and passes herself off as a 19-year-old.  As she gains recognition, she achieves a strange balance between two roles:  Jesse is at once a queen, a self-absorbed young women who cares for no one, yet she is also a little girl, a wide-eyed transplant from rural Georgia, who is helpless and powerless.  She gains power as others show her recognition – as those girls who once chastised her are seen to be less than her.  She is the one given the admiration and positions they all desire.</p>

<p>As the story moves forward, she becomes less sympathetic.  Her arrogance and selfishness grow as she loses her status as a young victim.  She oscillates between these two roles.  At parts, she becomes the victim she played, the victim she genuinely was and pretended to be.  In Plato’s <em>Republic</em>, he suggests in his discussion on actors that “If they imitate they should imitate, not any meanness or baseness, but the good only; for the mask which the actor wears is apt to become his face.”</p>

<p>It is important to keep her age in mind while making any criticisms of her character.  Is she really to blame for anything?  Can we provide any hard character judgments of this inexperienced, lonely girl?  The closest thing she has to a caregiver or friend, aside from Dean, is Ruby (Jena Malone).  As a fellow model and competitor for work and adulation, it is difficult to discern whether Ruby really cares for her.  She does not seem entirely genuine, yet her deceptiveness is never definite.  She is always somewhere in between; she feigns concern and shows concern at the same time.  Is she warning Jesse of the predatory gatekeepers, the amoral fashion designers and photographers, to help her, or to bump off the new competition?  After her Faustian pact, does she sell her country soul to gain the glory and power of an elite model – accepting Ruby as her Mephistopheles?</p>

<p>She, like most adolescents, wants to be the powerful and independent figure without the responsibility which comes with it.  When she returns to her motel room to find a jaguar, her responsibility stares her in the face.  She cannot deny that she is the young blood which is to be fed to the vultures of the industry.  After leaving the sliding door open, the jaguar got in.  While this is, in part, her own doing, she refuses to acknowledge her sense of agency.  The sliding door is her wager, the Pandora’s box which she opens up with the hope of catching some diamonds in the pool of the saber teeth, glass shards, and knives. <br>
Dean, though seeming more genuine in his concern, has his own issues.  From his accent we can tell he also comes from a rural area.  They connect with their earnestness and their feeling of being out of place.  As the two spend the night looking at the stars, he finds out her true age; he goes to leave yet she pulls him back.  He later goes in for a kiss when they arrive at her motel.  Is this a fault of his, that he is content establishing a romantic relationship with this Lolita figure – can an exception be made for the two?</p>

<p>If this case is at least somewhat ambiguous, there is actual pedophilia insinuated in the film.  Jesse stays alone in a cheap, dirty motel where the manager (Keanu Reeves) pimps out little girls.  Is this an accident that this theme was introduced, as an aspect of the highs and lows of the underground West Coast world of glamour, corruption, success, and failure?  There have been many documented incidents of pedophilia coming from the movie industry, with Corey Haim and Corey Feldman (“The Number one problem in Hollywood was and always will be pedophilia”) as alleged victims, the allegations made against Roman Polanski of drugging and sodomizing a 13-year-old girl, comments recently made by Elijah Wood (“Clearly something major was going on in Hollywood…it was all organized”).  </p>

<p>There is no consensual sex in the film.  Ruby does try forcefully to have sex with Jesse, despite her protests, though Jesse is able to break free.  It is difficult after this moment to take Ruby as a genuine companion.  Jesse does not have any ties with anyone in a serious manner.  She is not in love with Dean, and she does not care when he leaves.  She can take him or leave him.  She will let him pay for her motel damages and stick up for her, but she never reciprocates she anything other than her beauty.  It is difficult to find her as a sympathetic character; we can pity her, we can empathize with her, but she lacks the connections with others to really have the audience care about her and her situation.  Her parents are “gone” but we do not know if they died or if they left her or she left them.  Everything is temporary – her jobs, her motel room, her acquaintances, her styles.  It is indicative of the frivolous culture, one with an eroded foundation and cheap innovations, with frills, bells, and whistles which clash with rather than complement one another, which is modern America.  The women have anxiety over their “expiration dates” which come around age 20.  </p>

<p>The richness of the sounds and colors with which Refn presents us contrast with the lack of emotional depth in the characters.  There is clear pain in several of the women, and rampant envy and pride, but the interpersonal connections are otherwise superficial or nonexistent.  He displays blood red, shapes and symbols which could either be ancient archetypes or modern cubist designs, the geometry of an acid-addled mind.  The soundtrack, like his other films, is a mix of ambient and electronic pieces, futuristic, always helping to paint a picture with the images and storyline.  Like <em>Only God Forgives</em>, we move through different frames of consciousness, in and out of dreams.  It eschews the realism of <em>Drive</em> for a kind of hybrid atmosphere, a dark fun house of blood, estrogen, and dressing rooms which lead to the sunny and luxurious landscape curtain which covers the spiritual wasteland of the elite west coast.</p>

<p>This film shows the purgatory in which the modern Western woman finds herself.  Somewhere between tradition and anti-tradition.  This mirrors the dichotomy between the natural and the artificial.  Jesse is the natural beauty who looks askance at her slightly older peers with pinned ears, shaved jaws, and a plethora of cosmetic surgery procedures under their belts.  Fashion designer Roberto Sarno sees this natural beauty in her, and values her over her artificially enhanced competition.  It is largely a world without men, without families, without children.  Jesse has no familial ties and no significant other.  As she becomes more habituated to her urban environment she rejects the love of Dean for the independence of her career.  The blood throughout the film can be seen as a sign of either life or death.  There is one scene with Jesse flat on the floor, a pool of blood below her vagina.  Is this the death of her generative power?  Does she choose the life of cold appearances over the warmth and depth of a more traditional life?  The blood of life is something she supplies for the demands of the envious and predatory outsiders.  Once rejected, a competitor of hers is found in the bathroom after smashing the mirror.  Jesse is here compassionate for a brief moment, which results in the other girl trying to suck her blood.  It is a world where the young are taken for everything they have.  They are seen as a fountain of youth, and the cycle repeats as the once young become the predators of the new prideful young women.</p>

<p>Race figures in this movie in that, for the most part, everyone is white.  There is one scene, before Jesse first meets Roberto Sarno, where all of the models are posing in a large, brightly lit room.  There is one black women posing alone in the background with all of the white women a short distance away from her.  Was this deliberate on Refn’s part?  In a way it is indicative of the stark differences found in urban areas in the current world.  There is generally a mix of the lumpenproletariat and the elites (and those which strive to be elites), accepting for a small portion of the middle class which has not yet migrated from the city or has recently migrated to the city).  This small world of barren women, where whites are a majority, is closed off from outside, where non-white Hispanics are now the majority in California.  Rather than producing at the rates of the other groups, these women of the current zeitgeist feed off the blood of others (in this case it is the young women, though it can also be men and the institutions and capital generated from them).  They do not produce and they are unhappy, and they blame the men for their unhappiness.  While the sexes display this antagonistic relationship with one another, this modern mindset of Western women is conspicuously lacking in non-white people.</p>

<p>We are left with a dark world of empty wombs, starved, frigid women whose “desirable” appearance is inversely related to their health and well-being.  Young girls kill themselves to have the bodies of prepubescent boys.  The women live fast, peak early, and then live in desperation, while the men are left confused at their own rejection and isolation.  It is an intensely individualistic world for those in this microcosm, the world of lonely striving and vain pursuit at the expense of others in one’s own group (while in the outside world, other groups act collectively to wield power and take over demographically and culturally).  Is this a snapshot Refn took for the time capsule of modern degeneracy and dissolution in the West?  Is it just one strange erotic nightmare – or is it somewhere in between?</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[From Christmas to (((Christmas)))]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you know much about Jews, you're probably aware that they're not really big fans of Christmas. During their two thousand year exile in Europe, the one thing they could rely on regardless of if they were in Berlin, or Brussels, or in Paris, or in Prague, or in Vienna,</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/24/from-christmas-to-christmas/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">f5a1d0bf-98d0-457d-85ee-287c5259a0cf</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tory Scot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:54:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you know much about Jews, you're probably aware that they're not really big fans of Christmas. During their two thousand year exile in Europe, the one thing they could rely on regardless of if they were in Berlin, or Brussels, or in Paris, or in Prague, or in Vienna, or in London, was a Christian culture being present. </p>

<p>Few things unite (or divide) a people as much as religion. It lays the moral framework that everybody agrees to work within, and the rites and celebrations that come with it help strengthen the social fabric by giving a common experience to everyone - almost everyone, that is. </p>

<p>While few holidays were as dearly celebrated by our ancestors as Christmas, to Jews Christmas was the celebration of a blasphemy among the goyim, an alienating celebration that separated them from society at large. Jewish refusal to take part in Christmas celebrations helped to create resentment between Jew and Gentile. </p>

<p>After the Second World War, Jews in America decided that one of the many things that should be remade was Christmas. In the 1930's ,40's and 50's, Jews in New York City virtually rewrote what Christmas was all about, in order to solidify their position in American society. Christmas was an awkward holiday for them, because they simply didn't fit into it (Jewish rejection of Christ always gave the holiday anti-Semitic undertones), so they went about remaking it so they would fit in. </p>

<p>This was done primarily by secularizing it. It may surprise you to hear that many of the most popular Christmas songs were written by Jews. I apologize in advance for rendering the reader unable to listen to any of the following songs without wincing: Silver Bells, Santa Baby, Winter Wonderland, Let it Snow, Rockin' Around the Christmas Tree, and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.</p>

<p>That's right. Rudolph, or should I say, (((Rudolph))) is a Jew. It only gets worse from here. You won't finish this article with your childhood intact, because the story of that reindeer is one of the most egregious examples of Jews rewriting Christmas. </p>

<p>The popular song was written by the Jewish songwriter (((Johnny Marks))), and it was based off the original story that introduced (((Rudolph))) to America written by <a href="http://www.interfaithfamily.com/arts_and_entertainment/popular_culture/Shining_a_Light_on_the_Largely_Untold_Story_of_the_Origins_of_Rudolph_the_Red-Nosed_Reindeer.shtml">(((Robert L. May))) in 1939</a>.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>To be clear: May never mentioned in any interview he gave or article he authored that he was born Jewish, that his first wife was Jewish or that his daughter Barbara had two Jewish parents.</p>
  
  <p>Yes, Robert May hid his Jewish background. Still, I think it is fair to say that he drew on his status as a member of an ethnic/religious minority to create Rudolph.</p>
  
  <p>Rudolph is, after all, a tale well within the humanist literary tradition of teaching tolerance. Someone is despised or persecuted for an accident of birth like their race, religion, ethnicity or apparent physical disability, then the absurdity and cruelty of discrimination is thwarted when that person (or in the case of Rudolph, an animal) shows his worth when a kindly soul gives him a chance to shine. Rudolph was ahead of its time as an after school special.</p>
  
  <p>I, therefore, was not that surprised when I learned that Robert May was Jewish (at least by birth). More than once I have thought how funny it was that May made Rudolph's nose the feature that singled out Rudolph for discrimination. I need hardly point out that Jews are stereotypically depicted as having large noses. This stereotype is a long-standing theme in anti-Semitic jokes.</p>
  
  <p>There is no doubt that May also drew upon his history of childhood bullying in creating Rudolph. While these two strands are certainly not mutually exclusive, I was not able to find out if May was ever bullied specifically for being Jewish. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>The song and book were so popular that they eventually spawned their own movie. If you thought that the film version would be less echoey than the book and the song, I have bad news for you. The claymation television special first aired in 1964. Based off of (((May's))) original story and featuring (((Marks'))) song, the film was narrated by (((Burl Ives))), written by possible Jew (((Romeo Muller))) -pictured below-, directed by (((Larry Roemer))), another uncomfirmed Jew, and produced by Rankin and Bass. There's some debate about the ancestry of the last two. </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/unnamed.png" alt=""></p>

<p>The story starts in the North Pole, where the head of Santa's reindeer team, Donner, is with his wife. Ms. Donner is giving birth. The child is born, but something's a little amiss - his nose glows (much of the film revolves around a very Jewish concern about being mocked about/identified by a nose). Donner realises that there's something wrong with this, and that his (((nose))) is going to make it clear to everyone around that he's different. Donner covers his son's nose so he'll fit in. Incidentally, I think Donner sounds a lot like George Lincoln Rockwell.</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/donner.jpg" alt=""></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>​Now listen here, Rudolph, no son of mine is gonna be a Jew.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>(((Rudolph))) the hook-nosed reindeer heads off to play in the Reindeer Games with other young bucks hoping to prove themselves to Santa Claus. Somehow (((Rudolph))) performs well, which is how you can tell this is a fictional story. During the course of playing with a friend, (((Rudolph's))) false nose falls off and everyone sees the infiltrator hiding among them. A pogrom ensues, the coach says (((Rudolph))) isn't welcome during the Reindeer Games, and Santa, that magnificient amalgamation of Odin and Saint Nicholas, chastises Donner for trying to sneak a Jew onto his sleigh team.  "The last time I let a Jewish reindeer on my team he dropped inciendary bombs instead of presents when we flew over Germany." Clarice, a girl who likes (((Rudolph))) is forbidden by her father from associating with him. (((Rudolph))) runs away from home.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, there's trouble at Santa's workshop. (((Hermey))) is an elf who isn't content being a simple labourer, down with all the goyim. He's better than that! He wants to take up the perrenial Jewish occupation of dentistry. His boss pleads with him to assimilate, but (((Hermey))) refuses and flees into the forest to become a partisan. </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/commisar-hermey.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p>(((Hermey))) and (((Rudolph))) eventually meet in the forest, and the two quickly bond over their refusal to assimilate to goyische society. They agree to team up and overthrow the tyranny of bourgeois society.</p>

<p>They meet (((Yukon Cornelius))), a prospector obsessed with discovering silver and gold. Oy vey. After an introduction, the prospector helps the two escape the clutches of the Abominable Snowman, a horrible anti-Semitic beast. I guess he's a Nazi or something. Anyways, the three escape on an ice floe and drift towards the Island of Misfit Toys, an island ruled by King Moonracer. There they find "misfit toys"- toys that have been rejected by wicked goy children. One doll tells the three that she was rejected for having a penis. Another is a lesbian action figure in a wheel chair. King Moonracer asks the three to convince Santa to find homes among the more gullible goyim. Teach them not to be so hateful and bigoted! The three eagerly agree while rubbing their hands/hoofs. </p>

<p>(((Rudolph))) decides to set out on his own so as to not risk his nose giving away his comrades to the Abominable Snowman. He grows into an adult, and decides that he can wait no longer. He decides to go home. When he arrives at his home, he learns that his family has left to look for him. </p>

<p>Our kvetching reindeer finds his family imprisoned in a cave by the Ambominable Snowman. The Abominable has brute strength and beats (((Rudolph))) unconcious, but (((Cornelius))) and (((Hermey))) arrive and outsmart him. One makes the noise of a pig at the entrance of the cave while the other prepares to drop rocks on his head when he wanders out. The dumb goy doesn't follower a kosher diet and he falls for the trap! That's right, goy! The Mercurians over the Apollonians! DIDN'T YOU READ YOUR SLEZKINE?!?!? They then pull his teeth while he's down, rendering him harmless. Maybe he's supposed to represent Germany?</p>

<p>Other stuff that doesn't matter happens, and then everyone returns home. The now harmless Abominable Snowman is brought by the three Jews as a chatel slave to Santa's castle to do their bidding. During his time in the wilderness, (((Hermey))) had a chance to read the works of Grasmci and realises that the overthrow of society must be prefaced by an infilitration of that society's institutions. He convinces (((Rudolph))) to join Santa's team and use his nose to get them through a bad storm. See, Santa needed (((Rudolph))), because it's not like he could have used headlights or anything. </p>

<p>The moral of the story: LISTEN, KID, GET THIS THROUGH YOUR GOYISCHE KOPF! YOU NEED US, YOU BIGOT!</p>

<p>The story of (((Rudolph))) is essentially one of Jews overcoming the barriers established by our forefathers, and of modern America dropping her guard. </p>

<p>There are other examples of this type of thing in Christmas movies. Rankin and Bass specifically made other movies with Jewish sentiments and themes. (((Liel Liebovitz))) writes the following in his article <a href="https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20160616212711/http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/119079/a-very-gay-jewish-christmas">A Very Gay, Jewish Christmas</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Watching Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town, the Rankin-Bass 1970 classic narrated by Fred Astaire and starring Mickey Rooney as the voice of Kris Kringle, I was struck by a fact that had somehow eluded me as a child, namely that the film’s villain is a Lederhosen-wearing, German-accented despot named Burgermeister Meisterburger who rounds up all the toys and burns them in the town’s square. His goons, dressed in Prussian army uniforms, stare impassively at the flames. A step or two away, a gaggle of kids, most of them dressed in tatters, look on with horror. A few scenes later, all the children, now forbidden from playing, are placed into forced labor scrubbing stockings.</p>
  
  <p>In case the allusions to the Holocaust weren’t blunt enough, there is also an elderly man, the Winter Warlock, hiding in the woods. He is skeletal, and his beard is long and scraggly and white. He is voiced by Keenan Wynn, the son of Ed Wynn (born Isaiah Edwin Leopold), one of Vaudeville’s brightest stars. Wynn Jr. makes the character, who later asks to be known simply as Winter, sound like Albert Brooks on a chicken soup binge, a graying Jew who is all self-doubt and shtick and exasperation and kindness</p>
  
  <p>I let my cocoa grow cold. How could I have missed the painfully obvious fact that my beloved escapist cartoon was essentially about a struggle between a sadistic Bavarian dictator and a kindly old Jew, with Kris Kringle stepping in to save the day like a red-clad, ho-ho-hoing Oskar Schindler? </p>
</blockquote>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/burgermeister_meisterburger_121112_620px.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p>He also writes that (((Hermey's))) effeminate voice is meant to imply homosexuality. It's worth noting that the writer. (((Romeo Muller))), never married or had children, a very odd thing for a succesful man in the first half of the twentieth century.</p>

<p>He concludes his article saying:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I’m still planning on watching the Rankin-Bass specials this Christmas—they’re hard to avoid—but it will not be the same. They’re no longer about blissful escape. They’re about persecution, animosity, anti-Semitism, and the other burdens of history—and the eternal goyishe yearning for a happy gay Jewish Christmas.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This Christmas, watch something like A Christmas Carol, a story that has on occasion been decried as being anti-Semitic. As William Melton writes <a href="https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20160219221410/http://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2010/12/20/is-dickens-a-christmas-carol-anti-semitic-christian-propaganda">here</a>, it's a story of an old, miserable, banker with a Hebrew name living in ninteenth century London who, as Mr. Melton puts it  "opens his heart to the Spirit of Christ -- and then, and only then, is he transformed into a loving human being. Scrooge done got himself saved. And had he not, well, we guess he'd still be an angry, greedy Jew banker destined for the shadows of an eternally-cold grave."</p>

<p>"...an angry, greedy Jew banker destined for the shadows of an eternally-cold grave." Ahhhhhh....now that's more like it!</p>

<p>Even if you aren't big on converting as opposed to deporting, it's still better than the alternatives. So, this Christmas, enjoy a goyische Christmas movie, listen to some old (thereby not Jewish) Christmas songs like God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen, or, even better, pick an old German Christmas song. As Hitler himself put it, nothing will ever replace Silent Night as a Christmas tradition. There's no lack of good volkish Christmas traditions for you to enjoy. Have a Merry Christmas, folks.</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/hitmas.png" alt=""></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[’Tis the Season for Hollow Consumerism]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><em>The <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/category/shows/the-war-room/">The War Room</a>'s Sacco Vandal originally published this at <a href="http://www.vandalvoid.com/single-post/2015/12/24/Tis-the-Season-for-Hollow-Consumerism">VandalVoid.com</a> on December 24, 2015<br>
-SS</em></p>

<p>It's that time of year when we Americans gather together with our loved ones to admire decorated evergreens in our living rooms, bake and consume a myriad array of cookies and other</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/24/tis-the-season-for-hollow-consumerism/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">7b60c859-9b8d-495b-8c44-b92306cdd915</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sacco Vandal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:52:34 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/category/shows/the-war-room/">The War Room</a>'s Sacco Vandal originally published this at <a href="http://www.vandalvoid.com/single-post/2015/12/24/Tis-the-Season-for-Hollow-Consumerism">VandalVoid.com</a> on December 24, 2015<br>
-SS</em></p>

<p>It's that time of year when we Americans gather together with our loved ones to admire decorated evergreens in our living rooms, bake and consume a myriad array of cookies and other sweets, binge watch a list of holiday television specials, and shower a plethora of cheap Chinese trinkets upon our spoiled children. Some of us try to weave an amorphous Christian message into the festivities. Others do not. But all in all, it is a season marred—for all of us—by frantic shopping sprees, desperate rushing to wrap the last gift, and a whirlwind of party planning.</p>

<p>Holidays are great because they perhaps represent the one last concrete excuse that we overworked and overtly distracted Americans have left to spend time with our families. But I can't help this nagging feeling that even these rare and fleeting holiday get togethers are becoming as hollow as the over-commercialized holidays themselves. Most of the time spent at a typical American's Christmas party will consist solely of lighthearted jokes, requisite pleasantries, and simply “catching-up.” Now, there is nothing necessarily wrong about any of these things (and at least the children will get to see their cousins for once); however, as I recline back in my chair, sip my seasonal beer, and—now that the kids have all gone to bed—stare at my Christmas tree, I ponder: isn't there some sort of deeper tranquility that this holiday is supposed to bring to me?</p>

<p>I am not what one could consider a particularly enthusiastic adherent to the Christian faith. Nevertheless, Christianity is a part of Western culture. It is more-or-less synonymous with being a White American. And I thus embrace it as a part of my heritage, but only nominally. So my holiday lamentations aren't meant as a prelude to teary-eyed pleas for more giving to the poor, praying, or singing happy birthday to Jesus on December twenty-fifth. But there exists an undeniable void in the spiritual life of the contemporary American, and what Christmas has become is a symptom of that inner sickness.</p>

<p>I say that because this holiday that is intended to bring families together and make them stronger only makes me sad. It makes me sad because the family itself has been mortally wounded by liberalism and cultural Marxism. It makes me sad because we Americans have become so atomized and so alienated. It makes me sad because I look at the children, and I wonder what their lives will be like under this junk culture that has been foisted upon us, this hollow consumerism, this Mammon worship.</p>

<p>American's have become so Satanically individualistic that many of us are refusing to even rear families—even when locked in heterosexual matrimony! Indeed, countless White American couples will be attending family Christmas parties tonight merely to laugh at the siblings or cousins of theirs with children, believing them idiots for being duped into having those kids. Sure, they'll pat their nieces or nephews on the head for five or ten minutes but then go back to their adolescent escape-artist world of booze, marijuana, and smartphone Facebook.</p>

<p>And what of these few children that some of us still insist on having this holiday season? They will lay on the floor, over-stimulated and unsure over which one out of the twenty-seven new and over-sized plastic toys in front of them to play with the wrong way first. Doubtless, we adults will have also turned on the latest mass produced Disney Junior holiday special (with a moral about sharing, or something, of course) for them on the giant flat screen so that we adults can sip an extra Mimosa undisturbed while we gossip and wisecrack—no real substantive conversation here because we all know that you never talk religion or politics at a party, folks (heavens no, you'd might have to disagree with someone if you did that).</p>

<p>We tell ourselves that we are making warm memories for these children, and I'm sure that we are. Unfortunately, those warm memories will be of Frosty the Snowman saying “Happy Birthday,” or of some gay little elf wanting to pull teeth instead of make toys. Yes, we spent all year chasing the almighty dollar, and during the holidays—instead of giving them real family memories and making sure they imbibe a firm basis in tradition—we spoil them with toys from China. Now, we only have to sit back and wait to see which of the girls will grow up to have mixed-race babies with a string of deadbeat baby daddies. Or which of the boys will grow up to be a pothead video game addict who hopes to dwell in the basement well into his thirties. Or, worse yet, which of the girls and/or boys will come home from school one day at the age of fifteen demanding that he or she or it or whatever be referred to by pronouns of the opposite gender and that you take them to see a psychologist so that they can be prescribed hormone therapy treatment.</p>

<p>The very celebrations that we get together to celebrate this time of year are under assault. For, as we all know, all of Western civilization itself is under assault. Our way of life and all our traditions—all the foundations of family too—are being threatened by the liberal elite apparatuses that hold our people in bondage. And they are being threatened too by the pullulating Muslim hordes at the gates, clamoring to be let in in order to destroy us. Meanwhile, we eat gingerbread and fuss over which Precious Moments ornament we're going to go all out for this year. What we should be doing is trying desperately to find a way to make our holiday season substantive once again, to make of them something that truly helps hold onto and propel forward traditions and traditionalism instead of serving as some vehicle to facilitate escapism, distraction, and hollow consumerism.</p>

<p>Originally published at <a href="http://www.vandalvoid.com/single-post/2015/12/24/Tis-the-Season-for-Hollow-Consumerism">VandalVoid.com</a> on December 24, 2015</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Eternal Cuck]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Year of the Fire Monkey has proven one of bounteous plenitude for edgy Alt Right internet pundits. Whether you're a wagecuck slaving away to keep ZOG's finely tuned cogs churning, or a comfy NEET fighting a valiant guerrilla war for reclamation of The Oven, 2016 has truly been the</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/23/the-eternal-cuck/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">18aa08a4-3437-4ac9-b336-19ae8c6ac16f</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sirjamesthegood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:28:31 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Year of the Fire Monkey has proven one of bounteous plenitude for edgy Alt Right internet pundits. Whether you're a wagecuck slaving away to keep ZOG's finely tuned cogs churning, or a comfy NEET fighting a valiant guerrilla war for reclamation of The Oven, 2016 has truly been the Current Year that just keeps on giving.</p>

<p>For one type of white man, however, the Fire Monkey has proven not so benevolent. I speak, of course, of the eternal cuck.</p>

<p>The cuck worships at the altar of political correctness. His every action is tailored to signal his piety to other cucks and nonwhites, whether he's retweeting some masturbatory feel-good sob piece or failing his evolutionary mandate by dedicating his feeble life force to the rearing of his wife's black son.</p>

<p>It is therefore understandable that the cuck sees the grassroots, bottom-up political machinations of the Alt Right as anarchy. His unrefined political sensibilities distinguish not between the Molotov cocktail-flinging, 2x4-wielding anarcho-communists and the sophisticated pepemancer dishing out dank OC in-between TRSEF raids. To him, they're all heretics insofar as they've deviated from officially-sanctioned, PC doctrine.</p>

<p>The only politics for which his crude worldview permits is a spectrum ranging from Barrack Obama to John McCain, Hilary Clinton to Jeb Bush. When a brave soul dares declare “There's no meaningful difference!” the cuck retorts, “But that is the whole point! No shepherd and one herd! Everybody wants the same, everybody is the same: whoever feels different goes voluntarily into a madhouse.”</p>

<p>And then, on the brink of our demographic displacement, He happened.</p>

<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/IjZO8uC.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p>At a crossroads in history, one man appeared to challenge the hitherto indomitable political orthodoxy. Throwing caution to the wind, he honed in on the crucibles of cuck groupthink and ruthlessly pulverized them into fine, politically-correct particles. </p>

<p>With the God Emperor of Mankind at the helm of the GOP, no cuck dogma was inviolate.</p>

<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/JCMwapG.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p><em>Well, almost.</em></p>

<p>They called him a clown, a racist, an Islamophobe, a xenophobe, a homophobe, a fascist, and an anti-Semite. (I would hyperlink to examples, but they're far too numerous to choose from). Yet with every attempted stumping, his lead only got ten points longer. It seemed nothing could stop his ascent to power. One-by-one, the establishment's chosen candidates were swept aside. His candidacy seemed to be propelled forward by some inexorable force of nature, as if all of our ancestors had risen in unison to decry the balkinization of our once great country.</p>

<p>All the while, the eternal cuck looked on in Whiggish horror. “B-b-but it's the Current Year!” he cried. “This wasn't supposed to happen!” </p>

<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/HKbZhW7.jpg" alt=""></p>

<p><em>And that's how it starts. The fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness that turns good cucks....cruel.</em> </p>

<p>And so the cuck started to lash out. He swung with the wild rage of a man experiencing political disenfranchisement for the first time in his life. He made obscene death threats against white workers in a bizarre genocidal screed entitled “The Father-Furher.” Democracy itself—that most blessed and sacrosanct of institutions to the cuck—was blamed, and the assertion made that the elites needed to “take back” their country from this upstart <em>novus homo</em> and his unruly mob of plebeian usurpers. Charades of third-party candidacy were undertaken, led by the platonic form of cuckservatism himself.</p>

<p>As we inaugurate the coming thousand-year Trumpenreich, it is important to remember that the cuck is not, in and of himself, the enemy. Rather, he is the Uncle Tom. The sellout. The traitor. Ridden with guilt over the original sin of whiteness, he seeks to atone for his racial impurity with acts of unilateral altruism for nonwhites. These are always performed loudly in the public square so the cuck may boast of his great deeds of tolerance to win approval from his bourgeois social circle.</p>

<p>In the end, it dohn mattah. Nunnadis mattahs. No act of cucking, no matter how great, will earn the cuck forgiveness in the eyes of nonwhites. To them, the cuck will always be a useful idiot and shabbos goy—someone nonwhites praise to his face (if he's lucky) and mock behind his back. At best, he is merely “The Other.” He's sold his own people out for temporary career advancement and disingenuous pats on the back.</p>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IF_qd78hYXY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 

<p>For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the hatred of the nonwhite and his accusations of racism.</p>

<p>And so we bully the cuck. And we will continue to do so until, like the roommate who has heard one too many fat jokes and finally starts lifting, they leave behind their self-hating pretense of moral superiority and join us in securing the existence of our people and a future for white children.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Somebody’s Spreading the STDs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I was standing in the express line (twelve items or less) at Food Lion, one of the South’s low to mid-tier grocery chains. I prefer Food Lion over Kroger and Whole Foods because it’s genuinely quicker to get in and out when running errands – the bourgeois and intolerable</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/23/somebodys-spreading-the-stds/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">013a8286-b5a1-4360-ad18-fe650a2efaa2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Silas Reynolds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:54:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/STD-Billboard.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/STD-Billboard.png" alt="Somebody’s Spreading the STDs"><p>I was standing in the express line (twelve items or less) at Food Lion, one of the South’s low to mid-tier grocery chains. I prefer Food Lion over Kroger and Whole Foods because it’s genuinely quicker to get in and out when running errands – the bourgeois and intolerable SWPLs and organic-only non-GMO fanatics swarm the two stores and make the experience more than unpleasant. There is a tradeoff for shopping at Food Lion though, you’ll experience a mixed (and colorful) bag of humanity. On one hand, you’ve got your salt of the Earth - country folks, rednecks and blue-collar workers (my kind of people). On the flip side, you’ve got a parade of horrors – lazy dindus, obese mudsharks and low IQ (and usually portly) white trash peasants using the complimentary scooters.</p>

<p>I looked at the woman standing in front of me in the checkout line. From her neck down to her toes, she seemed fairly normal. Looked like she was likely a bank teller and was swinging by the grocery store after work. Then I glanced at her face and knew immediately this was the face of a coal burner – unhealthy amount of heavy makeup, significant eye liner and an angled bob hairstyle with blonde highlights. In other words, picture <a href="http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/heh/">this</a>. She had a hatchet face and a perpetual arrogant look about her, although that may have been influenced by her painted on eyebrows. Naturally, she had more than twelve items (probably meals for a full week) and instead of leaving after paying the pimply store clerk – she circled around the checkout lanes and joined her jiggaboo boyfriend behind me. His items were less than twelve – a pack of Swisher Sweets and two tall 24oz Steel Reserves (probably to take the edge off after a long hard day).</p>

<p>As I was leaving Food Lion, I began wondering how many sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) she’d had (or still had). A grotesque thought for sure, but I recalled that a friend of mine had told me about the disturbing STD rates infesting the colored community. Mudsharks, or “once you go black, we don’t take you back,” usually stick with their dindu dependents once they betray their race, which compounds their likelihood of being polluted by “The Clam” or “The Clap” (or some other foul affliction). Eventually, this random observation led me down the (Br’er) Rabbit (and Tar-Baby) hole to unearth the unsettling STD colored contagion plaguing our country.</p>

<p>In an anarcho-capitalist (think imaginary) political system, the spread of STDs amongst the dindu population wouldn’t be much of a problem – after all, it’s their problem and we wouldn’t have to worry about paying for it. However, in reality, we (think White people) do have to pay for this problem – and it’s a fairly steep cost. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which certainly couldn’t be described as “fake news” or partisan, <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/sti-incidence-prevalence-cost-fact-sheet-508.pdf">reported</a> in 2013 that the conservative estimate on the lifetime cost of treating eight of the most common STDs contracted in just one year is $15.6 billion. In addition, (((<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-02-13/sex-diseases-cost-16-billion-a-year-to-treat-cdc-says">Bloomberg</a>))) reported that curable STDs cost $742 million alone, with chlamydia as the most common and the most expensive.</p>

<p>If you only read the Bloomberg article, you’d just think that “younger patients” are spreading a contaminated form of coitus. But, diving into the data reveals that the people perpetuating this blight are, like proportional violent crime and abortion rates, overwhelmingly non-Whites – but more specifically, the “muh black community.”</p>

<p>For instance, let’s look at chlamydia (affectionately called “The Clam” by sailors everywhere) - which is a common STD that can infect both men, women and creatures that identify as something in-between. It can cause serious permanent damage to a woman's reproductive system, making it problematic or impossible for her to get pregnant later on. Also, chlamydia can cause a potentially fatal ectopic pregnancy (pregnancy that occurs outside the uterus). Symptoms in women can include a nasty vaginal discharge or burning with urination. Symptoms in men, the only other remaining gender, may include an unnatural discharge from the penis, burning with urination (never a good sign), or pain and swelling of one or both testicles. In addition to the not-so-cute nickname “The Clam,” its also been called the “Silent” STD - that’s because many times those with chlamydia have no idea they’ve been infected (think niggers).</p>

<p>The CDC <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats15/minorities.htm#foot-8">reports</a> that rates of chlamydia (only the reported cases) were highest for dindus aged 15–19 and 20–24 years in 2015. Among males aged 15–19 years, the rate of reported chlamydia cases among jiggaboos was <strong>8.8 times greater</strong> than “fucking white males” in the same age bracket. Overall, the clam rate among black men was 6.8 times higher than the rate among White men. The same study also reveals that the rate among the sistas was 5.4 times higher than White women, likely due to “muh racism.” Just look at President High Yeller’s hometown of <a href="http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/chicago-std-rates-double-triple-national-averages/">Chi-town</a>: chlamydia continues to be the most common communicable disease in the Windy City, with more than 27,000 new infections reported to the Chicago Department of Public Health in 2014, about 8% higher than 2010. Chicagoans (just call them niggers) are twice as likely to have chlamydia and nearly three times more likely to have gonorrhea than residents of other areas in the U.S (second only to the City of Brotherly Love – wonder what the common theme is with those two cities?).</p>

<p>And speaking of dystopian open-air prisons, also known as major U.S. cities, the 2009 <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917819/">study</a> titled “<em>Gender and racial differences in risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases among justice-involved youth</em>” confirms our suspicions regarding dindu inmates, even those in juvie. Per the study, “On average, minority juvenile offenders display higher rates of STD infection compared to white juvenile offenders. Based on samples of incarcerated adolescents, reported substantially higher STD rates for minority detainees compared to white detainees. The chlamydia positivity rate for African-American detainees was 9.9% compared to 5.8% for white adolescent detainees. Similarly, the gonorrhea positivity rate was nearly three times higher for African-American detainees compared to white detainees.”</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/specialpops.htm">Approximately</a> two thirds of the cases of primary and secondary syphilis diagnoses in the United States are due to sodomites (a little tidbit not likely included in the propaganda show <em>Modern Family</em>). This isn’t necessarily groundbreaking, except for research that illustrates STDs are significantly magnified by the low-impulse control of dindus “on the down low.” One study (<em>Repeat syphilis among men who have sex with men in California, 2002-2006</em>) found that faggots that had repeat primary or secondary syphilis infection within 2 years of an initial infection were due to one of the following factors: “HIV infection, [being of the] black race, and having ≥ 10 recent sexual partners.” In other words, being a nigger nancy boy was equivalent to having HIV or fucking more than 10 recent partners. That’s one hell of a force multiplier. Another <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-016-1590-8">study</a> also states the obvious: homosexual black men and “natural conservative” la-teen-oos have a higher incidence of HIV than your run-of-the-mill white homosexuals. Wonder if race and IQ levels have anything to do with this?</p>

<p>Also per the objective <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/healthdisparities/africanamericans.html">CDC</a>, in 2014, <strong>55.4% of <em>all</em> reported cases of gonorrhea occurred among blacks</strong>. Gonorrhea, warmly called “The Clap,” “A Dose” or “The Drip,” can cause a white, yellow or greenish goo to leak from “muh dik,” as well as, a sore throat from fellatio – you can get some other nasty symptoms from “a dose” but you get my meaning. For a vibrant community that’s 12.2% of the population (excluding self-described “mixed” races and per the 2010 Census) these numbers should be alarming to everyone – shitlibs included.  The rate of gonorrhea among blacks in 2014 was 405.4 cases per 100,000 population, which was <strong>10.6 times the rate among Whites</strong> (38.3), the disparity between Whites was similar for both strong black men (10.6 times) and proud women of color (10.7 times). Syphilis was almost as bad – with 38% all known cases in 2014 being attributed to this vibrant community.</p>

<p>Gonorrhea, HIV and syphilis aren’t going away anytime soon – it’s becoming harder to treat some gonorrhea and syphilis (HIV is already pretty hard to treat, just ask Magic Johnson – who reckoned that he slept with at least a 1,000 women), as drug-resistant strains are increasing due to low IQ humanoids and faggots literally fucking anything that moves and strengthening the diseases. Like dindu <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3498799/Man-34-goes-prison-life-infecting-14-year-old-girl-toddler-HIV-chlamydia-herpes.html">David Wilson</a>, already a registered sex offender, who went on to rape two small children and infect them with HIV, chlamydia and herpes (triple threat). Nushawn Williams, also known by his street name “Shyteek Johnson,” was HIV positive, but that didn’t stop him from officially infecting 75 “women” (use the term loosley because if they weren’t underage girls, they were most certainly gutter trash). In typical nigger behavior, he boasted of infecting as many as 300. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2336321/Porn-star-Mr-Marcus-jailed-knowingly-exposing-stars-syphilis-causing-outbreak-closed-industry.html">Mr. Marcus</a> effectively shut down the porn industry in LA for spreading syphilis and “<a href="http://www.healthnewsline.net/missouri-man-knowingly-exposed-partners-to-hiv-secretly-filmed-sexual-encounters/2532101/">Tiger Mandingo</a>,” also known as twenty-two-year old Michael Johnson, knowingly infected at least 30 gay men with HIV.</p>

<p>The potent mix of sub-IQ blacks and STDs really should be raising some red flags – maybe even hoisting the black flag. In May of this year, a CDC expert <a href="http://rollingout.com/2016/05/06/cdc-expert-states-hiv-rate-in-atlanta-as-bad-as-african-countries/">stated</a>, “Downtown Atlanta is as bad as Zimbabwe or Harare or Durban.” In other words, we’ve got big problems - not only in the Big Peach, but also across the country if one of our major cities is being compared to an African hellscape by someone not in the Alt-Right. With the CDC <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/healthdisparities/africanamericans.html">reporting</a> that between 2010 and 2014 blacks accounted for 45% of all HIV infections and black women representing (this is a truly staggering number) 62% of those HIV infections, the question remains – what does “I fucking love peer-reviewed research” say?</p>

<p>Well, it says they’re pretty fucking stupid.</p>

<p>The 1994 study titled “<em>What is the significance of black-white differences in risky sexual behavior?</em>” provides some interesting insight. Below are some juicy items from the red pilling report, “Results indicated that whites in the multiple partners and single partner groups were more likely to engage in anal and oral sex, while <strong>African Americans were more likely to have sex with prostitutes</strong>. However, <strong>angry reactions about the use of condoms occurred more with African Americans</strong> (P &lt; .003) and males (P &lt; .05) than with whites or females. While whites reported a greater use of drugs and a significantly higher level of knowledge about HIV/AIDS, African Americans reported a significantly greater perception of risk for being exposed to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (P &lt; .01) and significantly more gonorrhea (P &lt; .10), syphilis (P &lt; .05), and HIV/AIDS (P &lt; .05). <strong>No whites in our sample were treated for syphilis nor had they tested positive for HIV/AIDS</strong>. 71 (47%) Black males, 29 (19%) Black females, 20 (50%) White males, and 24 (38%) White females were currently involved with more than one sexual partner. <strong>Blacks in the multiple partners subgroup were significantly more likely than their White counterparts to have experience with prostitutes, indicate an <em>intense anger</em> response to condom use, and perceive themselves as at high risk for HIV/AIDS.</strong>”</p>

<p>With <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124628530">48%</a> of sassy black women, aged between 14 and 49, having some form of genital herpes, along with the other problematic maladies discussed here – what’s to be done?</p>

<p>For one, we need to have an inclusive and safe space for a national conversation – all ideas, no matter how “extreme” or uncomfortable should be considered. </p>

<p>Secondly, as for my recommendation, I would respectfully submit, and I’m channeling my inner Rick Harrison here – the best I can do is - recommend compulsory and irreversible chemical castration for those with repeat infections.</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/STD-Image-3.jpg" alt="Somebody’s Spreading the STDs"></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[What The West Needs: Male Leadership]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s become obviously apparent to me lately that many young (and older) men haven’t a clue as to how to interact with members of the opposite sex. More importantly, that the Men of the West have <strong>forgotten how to be men.</strong></p>

<p>There is so much bad information and</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/22/untitled-17/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6837d3bf-45a3-4366-84f2-60b740bdf4a8</guid><category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category><category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category><category><![CDATA[Men of the West]]></category><category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markos Power]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:40:02 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/trump-putin-1.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/trump-putin-1.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership"><p>It’s become obviously apparent to me lately that many young (and older) men haven’t a clue as to how to interact with members of the opposite sex. More importantly, that the Men of the West have <strong>forgotten how to be men.</strong></p>

<p>There is so much bad information and propaganda out there that this is understandable. Our schools, Hollywood, and the Corporate Media have tried to hold down and insult our boys and men, in favor of feminine behavior and female leadership  (Star Wars Force Awakens).</p>

<p>On that note, I will touch on something very important.</p>

<h2 id="thewestisindireneedofmaleleadership">The West Is In Dire Need Of Male Leadership</h2>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/men-in-skirts.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership">
<em>True leadership: Men in skirts protesting the rapes in Europe. How else would you stop the rapes?</em></p>

<p>The current state of affairs in the West is one of weakness. </p>

<p>Conformity, '<a href="https://http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/14/tolerance-is-weakness/" target="_blank">Tolerance</a>', “let’s all just get along”,  and not hurting other people’s feelings are all feminine traits. These traits serve our women well in a homogeneous society, where cooperating or not can be the difference between life and death. These are good and useful traits.</p>

<p>But in today’s multicultural globalist society, where women and weak men have taken the reigns, these traits will be the death of us all.</p>

<p>These traits are what currently shape and direct the West. You could say that ‘tolerance’, ‘acceptance’,’non-judgement’, and ‘love’ is what directs the Western moral compass. (Of course, none of these apply to people of European descent and are actually used as a weapon against them. These are empty sayings used to control people’s language and thoughts.)</p>

<p>For example:</p>

<p><strong>Military aged Muslim men invading your shores by the millions?</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><p><strong>Masculine response</strong>: “Wait, what’s going on here? Why are all these young Muslim men with iPhones and Nikes flooding into our countries? None of them are even from Syria. They’re all from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Sub-Saharan Africa. They are sexually assaulting our women and killing our people. I think we may need to put a stop to this.” </p></li>
<li><p><strong>Feminine response</strong>: “The Corporate Media has instructed us that these Pakistani and Sub-Saharan refugees are fleeing from a brutal civil war in Syria. We need to help these people in any way we can. Don’t be mean to them and don’t judge their culture. We can all get along.”</p></li>
</ul>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/c6c3fe6a-4960-477c-a85a-d17abd3fb64d-2060x1236.jpeg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership">
<em>Poor innocent Africans fleeing the brutal civil war in Syria</em></p>

<p><strong>Globalists flooding your country with non-Whites and trying to demographically replace you?</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><p><strong>Masculine response</strong>: “Wait a second, why has the historic population of America gone from 90% White European to 60% White European? The majority of these non-White settlers all vote Democrat and for Cultural Marxist policies.  Why can’t we keep our country as a White European nation; why is it so wrong? It seems the quota for immigrants was changed from majority European immigrants to majority non-European immigrants with the passage of the Immigration Act of 1965."</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Feminine response</strong>: We were told everything will be okay. Listen, if you complain you are just going to upset some people. We don’t want to hurt people’s feelings, so you must be silenced.</p></li>
</ul>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/mosque-in-athens.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership">
<em>How dare you deny these poor innocents the right to replace your people and culture with their own. Greece is for everyone, not just the Greeks</em></p>

<p><strong>Homosexuals pushing their agenda and criminalizing anyone that speaks out against it?</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><p><strong>Masculine response</strong>: “All of a sudden, there seems to be a huge push for this coming from the Corporate Media and our Globalist culture. Why is that? They used to just preach ‘tolerance’ for homosexuals, but now we literally cannot disagree with their lifestyle without being called names and threats to get us fired from our jobs. What’s going on here?"</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Feminine response</strong>: “We're told it's good so it must be good. We all need to get along. Love is Love. No conflicts please.”</p></li>
</ul>

<p><strong>The West is in dire need of male leadership.</strong> </p>

<p>Why do you think the Presidency of Donald Trump was so appealing to so many? Why do you think he won?</p>

<p>People are sick of weak and inept leadership. People want someone who is a leader; who knows what they are doing, and will fight to get it. Someone who can actually address the issues and ask the tough questions, not give us meaningless platitudes about "freedom, Democracy, and diversity.” </p>

<p><strong>Men lead; women follow.</strong></p>

<p>That is not my rule. That is the law of nature. Women want strong men to lead. To believe otherwise is nonsense. Look at history. It was strong men who shaped the direction of their respective cultures and nations. European men, Muslim men, Asian men, Meso-American men, etc. Feminists telling you that the reason women were not leaders because of 'patriarchy' is pure propaganda. </p>

<p>The last thing we need are more women telling men what to do and how to act. In other words,  we don’t need more women to try to be leaders of men. <br>
<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/squadgoals-1.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership"></p>

<h2 id="whymenshouldnevertakedatingadvicefromwomen">Why Men Should Never Take Dating Advice From Women</h2>

<p>Why am I even addressing this in the article? I do it because our feminist programming has instructed us that male and female advice is exactly the same, regardless of the topic. That advice from females is just as good, if not better, than advice from males. </p>

<p>But that's not the true. In regards to 'relationship advice', this is completely false.  Men and women are different; we aren't 100% exactly the same in every way. We need to expose our programming, and keep exposing it, in order for all of us to overcome it. </p>

<p>I want you to listen to me. Read this very closely.</p>

<p><strong>Women are the absolute WORST on the planet at giving out dating advice to men.</strong></p>

<p>That’s not a dig on women. I love women and respect them. They mean well. They do have a strong understand of social dynamics. But, they usually don’t know what they want.  </p>

<p><strong>Women are attracted to masculine men, just as men are attracted to feminine women.</strong></p>

<p>To men that are:</p>

<ul>
<li>Leaders</li>
<li>Builders</li>
<li>Strong both physically and mentally</li>
<li>Men who have a purpose and are driven</li>
</ul>

<p>Notice that this list is exactly what we in the West are lacking. </p>

<p><strong>Men who are dominant and who are leaders. Men who have a purpose.  These traits are what attract women to men.</strong></p>

<p>My question is this:</p>

<p>If women are attracted to the above, do you really think a woman can teach a man how to be a leader? How to be a builder? How to be dominant?</p>

<p>If you want to know how to be an accountant, you learn from an accountant. If you want to be a stock broker, you learn from a stock broker. If you want to attract yourself a woman, you find a man that knows how to attract women.</p>

<p><strong>Why would you ask a woman on ways for a man to attract women?</strong> What do women know about attracting a woman as a man? If you're a man, you wouldn't start giving out advice to women on how to be feminine, as we don't know anything about that. We would let women teach other women on how to be a feminine woman.</p>

<p>Most of the time, women don’t even know what they themselves want. How many times have you heard a women tell you to just be nice, get to know her, and see if you’re a good match? How that's working out?</p>

<p>Many women believe that they want certain things because society tells them that they do. (This also applies to many men as well.)</p>

<p>Why do you think so many women in Europe are hitching up with the Muslim migrants, even after hearing the stories of them raping and sexually assaulting European women? </p>

<p>Do you think a woman is ever going to tell you this? </p>

<p><strong>But, you ask, what the hell does this have to do with what we’re trying to accomplish? Why am I telling you this?</strong></p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/ministers-of-europe.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership">
<em>Trust these 5 women to protect your country and people. Russia, Iran, and China are just sexist bigots</em></p>

<h2 id="thewestneedsstrongmentolead">The West Needs Strong Men To Lead</h2>

<p>Gents, this is the truth. If you say you are red-pilled, you need to accept this as a fact of nature.</p>

<p>We don’t need any more Angela Merkels. We don’t need anymore Theresa Mays. We don’t need anymore Marine Le Pens (who should be way ahead in the polls but may actually lose this election). And we certainly do not need any more Hillary Clintons.</p>

<p>We need strong, male leadership.</p>

<p>Think about it.</p>

<ul>
<li><strong>Vladimir Putin</strong></li>
<li><strong>Donald Trump</strong></li>
<li><strong>Rodrigo Duterte</strong></li>
<li><strong>Bashar al-Assad</strong> (love him or hate him, do you honestly think if a women was running Syria that she would be able to last 4+ years of intense civil war, with the U.S., Israel, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia trying to overthrow and kill her?)</li>
</ul>

<p>All the men above are strong and capable. These are leaders that both men and women respect.</p>

<p><strong>Men evolved to lead and protect the tribe.</strong></p>

<p>The crisis of male leadership is part of the reason Europe is being overrun with Muslims at this very moment. People keep asking ‘where are the men?’</p>

<p>I instead ask: “Does Europe even have any real men to lead?”</p>

<p>Others sneeringly ask: "why aren’t we simply talking about the banks, the globalists, and our corrupt politicians? Why are we talking about ‘being men?' This is childish."</p>

<p>I would say because we have to. So, you identified the problem. <strong>What are you going to do about it?</strong> Believe it or not, someone in the <strong>real world</strong>, not Internetland, is going to actually need to do something. Someone is going to need to run against and replace Angela Merkel. Someone is going to need to speak up against our repressive governments that are actually attacking and trying to replace their own people in the <strong>real world.</strong> </p>

<p>And you know what? If you’re a  fat little guy, with a horrible diet, who parties every weekend or plays video games while watching a bunch of porn, you’re not going to be able to change jack shit, no matter how much you complain about the issues we face. <strong>You're part of the problem and the only reason you call this 'childish' is because you are  <a href="http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/18/untitled-9/" target="_blank">self projecting your own adolescent immaturity and can't face up to someone bringing it up.</a></strong>  And you know it. </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/the-crab-mentality-3.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership"></p>

<p>We are going to need male leadership to make changes; not keyboard warriors and big mouths who refuse to do anything positive or contribute anything of value, but instead try to insult and drag down anyone and everyone making positive changes in their lives. </p>

<p>Now that Trump has won the Presidency, the adults have taken back control of the country. It’s time for us to do the same in our own lives. </p>

<p>It’s time for men to be men.</p>

<p><strong>Let’s Make Western Men Great Again.</strong>
<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/PersianEmpire03.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership">
<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/ag-empire.jpg" alt="What The West Needs: Male Leadership"></p>

<p>Also published at <a href="http://www.purposetopower.com/west-dire-need-masculinity-male-leadership/" target="_blank">Purpose To Power </a></p>

<p>.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Smallest, Greatest Purpose(s) in Life]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I've never met any of you and I may never do so. Despite the fact that we all share very common threads, for many on the "alt-right spectrum," from alt-light entryists to the Weevs, this is as good as it gets. We may never go to a pool party. We</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/22/untitled-12/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9b4980c0-87c2-4a25-b05f-94ba3b05800e</guid><category><![CDATA[family]]></category><category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category><category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Artist Formerly Known as TL ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:43:38 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/3387862300000578-3558124-image-a-18_1461606308980.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/3387862300000578-3558124-image-a-18_1461606308980.jpg" alt="The Smallest, Greatest Purpose(s) in Life"><p>I've never met any of you and I may never do so. Despite the fact that we all share very common threads, for many on the "alt-right spectrum," from alt-light entryists to the Weevs, this is as good as it gets. We may never go to a pool party. We won't be able to trek to TRStlemania. We may never get to don our spiffiest outfits to go to NPI or Amren. We may never ride in a Taxi with Mike Enoch through downtown New York City or toss back beers with Seventh Son at a backyard barbecue. But we find some value in going online and shitposting with others, and perhaps this adds some value to otherwise arduous, aimless lives. </p>

<p>It's not enough. Like Ghoul (F, PBUH) advocated, there has to be real life consequences for things to truly matter. That may come in different forms, but the point remains the same: Your life has to be more than what you do online. It has to have meaning beyond memes and podcasts and fighting the blood wars on social media.  </p>

<p>I think the true meaning of life lies in finding purpose beyond the self. Because you are here, you do not worship your own asshole like the special-snowflake left. Call it trite if you must, but there is a deep spiritual truth in finding a purpose greater than your own self-gratification. Mine came in family, and by God, this is the most important thing I will ever do. </p>

<p><strong><em>30-SOMETHING AND SINGLE</em></strong></p>

<p>By the time I turned 30, I thought my opportunity to have my own family passed me by. I wasted most of my 20's in a pointless relationship with a woman who could not bring herself to say "I love you," and had no intention of ever admitting to me she never wanted children to begin with. She was a product of the diseased, decadent culture that is choking the life out of Western Civilization: she has a career, a home, and all the trappings of entertainment she could ever hope to consume. And she is entering the last years of her fertility with almost no hope of providing grandchildren to her parents. Thank God Almighty I left her. But the clock was ticking. When you're in your early twenties, chasing pussy and getting your shit together is, understandably, first and foremost in your mind. But too quickly you will lose months and years of adulthood to those endeavors which in reality don't bring meaning to life. Life is not the sum total of orifices into which or onto which you ejaculate. You are not your career. It's important to have a career, don't get me wrong. I enjoy being a lawyer, but at the end of the day, if I were to suddenly disappear, literally nothing would change. Being 30, making a decent income, but not having anyone to share it with is a meaningless life. I wanted children, but my female peers were either married or too career oriented. </p>

<p>I met my wife who is several years younger than me through a friend whom I represented in a family law matter. She was attractive, friendly, from a large religious family, and had a great sense of humor. She did have a child, but I wasn't concerned with that. As I fell in love with her, I concluded that while medically it was unlikely she would ever be able to have kids again, the child's father is so distant I would practically be able to raise her myself, and have the father subsidize the parenting via child support. It wasn't perfect, but it at least gave me a chance to be a father, and 6 years later, that little girl has grown into an amazing 10 year old. Giving that kid a chance of being a productive member of society by ensuring a stable two parent household was a purpose, and while I wanted desperately for my own, being her papa was a purpose more than myself and I was okay with that.</p>

<p><strong><em>DON'T BUY A SPORTS CAR WITHOUT A PREGNANCY TEST</em></strong></p>

<p>So after getting married, my wife and I bought a house at the perfect time, the summer of 2012. Interest rates were at historic lows, the housing market was just coming off the bottom, and we scored a two-story 1500 square foot home with a 1500 square foot yard on a lake for $120K. It's funny, while this house could now fetch nearly $200K, it would go for over a million in the pozziest parts of the country (Silicon Valley). Our lives pushed on in relative peace, and my wife and I took the position that if we were to have a kid, God would make it happen (no birth control). After 2 years, we started to talk about adoption. This is the sad part: adopting non-disabled white children is nearly impossible. The State will practically pay you to adopt non-whites or disabled kids. We couldn't take on a disabled child because of limited resources (mostly time.) Adopting a white baby would take well over $25000 and well over one year to accomplish and even then it wasn't a guarantee. </p>

<p>So this past Mother's Day the wife and I had a discussion, and we concluded that the baby project wasn't panning out. Adoption wasn't viable at the time. Maybe down the road when my student loans were paid off we could do it. So my wife asked if we could trade in her fuel efficient vehicle for a sports car she always wanted. I figured it was no big deal. Car payment went from 200 bucks to 400, and a sports car convertible is nowhere near 40 MPG highway, but at the time it was well within the budget. So off we went to get my wife's dream car and she was quite happy about it. </p>

<p>Two weeks later, I go to look my wife up for a little bit of personal time, and she comments how she is late. This has happened a couple times in the past, with negative test results, so I didn't put any thought into it. She went up into the bathroom, and then called me in. <br>
"Honey, I'm pregnant," she uttered under her breath as she looked me dead in the eyes and handed over the small plastic CVS pregnancy test. I was floored, but then I wanted to be sure. I ran back to the drug store, got another test, and asked her to do it again. A pregnancy test like this has two spots on an indicator. When its negative, only the first spot shows a line. When it's positive, both spots show up. As the test results developed, the second spot lit up first. </p>

<p>"Uh honey, what does that mean?"</p>

<p>"It means not only am I pregnant, I'm really fucking pregnant!"  (The first line filled in a moment later.) </p>

<p>I was elated, but then I realized that we just took on a 20 thousand dollar convertible which my wife may not be able to drive soon due to her baby belly. God, once again, shows he has quite the sense of humor.</p>

<p><strong><em>THE SUFFERING THAT BINDS</em></strong></p>

<p>As an interested third party observer of pregnancy, I cannot for the life of me imagine going through it alone. The idea that a single mom can adequately carry and raise a child is ludicrous. When my wife and I first went to the obstetrician, we asked if he could just do a check to see the baby. During this whole affair, we couldn't see the babies enough. (Any reassurance that they were developmentally on-target gave a temporary reprieve from the myriad dangers and warnings bleated by friends, social media acquaintances, and well-meaning catlady relatives who chose never to have kids but live out their fantasies of being a grandparent through you. At any moment we were in fear of sudden miscarriage [a thing that happened to my wife in the past,]  hydrocephaly, cleft palate, fused bones, prenatal cancer, the zika virus, you name it.)</p>

<p>In any event the doctor said he knew how to turn on the ultrasound and turn it off and that was about it. So in he went and lo and behold at just a dozen or so weeks, we saw a little flashing light in a sea of black and gray monochrome, and that was the beating heart of our little kiddo. Being on the outside, you don't see much physical manifestation of your child's development aside from spousal vomiting and discomfort. I fell in love with that little flashing light and couldn't wait to see it again in a few weeks with the proper ultrasound technician. </p>

<p>During which we found out how funny God really wants to be. My stepdaughter (daughter, really, her actual father has seen her maybe 7 weeks in total in the past 6 years despite having the time and resources to see her as much as he wants) laughed during the ultrasound technician appointment that we were having twins and just didn't know it yet. I frowned at the notion as ridiculous as we obviously only saw one flashing light. And then that's when the technician reminded us that the doctor didn't exactly do much probing along the Z axis. Lo and behold, behind the flashing light was another flashing light. Thar be two babies here, cap'n. My jaw unhinged and my wife started crying. </p>

<p>There are no instances of twins in my family. None in my wife's either. Statistically, 2 in 100 pregnancies are fraternal twins. For all the practicing with nothing to show for it, now we had a lot to show for it. And having two babies is a consecutive, not concurrent affair. You need two of everything. Two cribs, two car seats, a stroller for two, twice as many diapers, clothes, wipes, binkies, onesies, you name it. Thank God almighty our families stepped up to help on that side of the equation.</p>

<p>From the father's perspective, a pregnancy is a slow then suddenly advancing assault on your wife's well being. Not to say that pregnancy is by any means unnatural, but the trip from finding out to delivery is a tough row to hoe. With twins, you double down on everything. By week 30 my wife was miserable. She could not sleep through the night. Her joints ached all the time. Her back would spasm. The boys would give her cervix a beating feminists only dream about. She got to a point where she could no longer drive the sports car; it sat so low she couldn't get out on her own, and as her belly approached 55 inches she couldn't fit behind the wheel. My wife worked as long as she could before throwing in the towel and going on bed rest: 33 weeks. She didn't want to do it; the harpies at her office said she wouldn't make it past 25 weeks. Work was a source of pride for her, but when she had to make the decision, it got to the point that she was having a hard time walking. My wife is no small fry, but the added weight was nothing short of miserable. She lost 45 pounds the day of surgery when all was said and done. </p>

<p>I hated to see my wife devolve in this manner. I loved that she was carrying my sons, I hated that she was bedridden and miserable. But every chance I could get I had my hands on her belly, and the boys would kick and roll around. I frequently played classical music on my cell phone with the speaker pointed right over the womb, and the guys would react. Knowing they were just under my wife's skin and muscle, waiting for their time to come out, was total relief. It was always worth it to my wife, no matter how much she suffered. And helping her get up and out of bed, helping her to the bathroom, helping her put on her underwear and socks in the morning because she couldn't reach, all of these things strengthened the spiritual bond we had in ways I never imagined. </p>

<p><strong><em>THE WHITEST ROOM</em></strong></p>

<p>My wife and I were very blessed to pick a delivery date and hold to it. Most twins are born premature, gestating on average 35 weeks and spending considerable time in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). We wanted the babies to come on December 1, a Thursday, allowing for a four day weekend for hospital recovery, but the obstetrician we wanted only did scheduled deliveries on Mondays, so December 5 became the day of reckoning. </p>

<p>Hospitals are amazing places when you're there for a good purpose. Aside from cutting off half of my thumb when I was a toddler, I never had to stay in a hospital. The woman's center welcomed us with fairly cushy digs, and in the lobby I discovered the blasphemous joy of Nescafe lattes. Once we arrived at our appointed time, nurses helped my wife and her 58 inch baby belly get dressed in appropriate hospital attire, and helped her apply cleansing agents to her body to ensure no chance of infection. The next hour was spent trying to find Baby B's heart rate; not that there was a problem, he's just an uncooperative cuss and had no desire to sit still for a heart monitor. Once the boys were green-lighted and my wife was prepared, I had to stuff my self, tennis shoes and all, into that flimsy green paper outfit, and off we went to the surgical suite. </p>

<p>They initially wouldn't let me in. My wife had to have a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB8nEYNhr0k">"block,"</a> which terrified her as she is deathly afraid of needles. She begged for them to let me hold her hand and distract her from the spinal injection, but it wasn't to be. I had to sit in a hallway by myself for 20 minutes, waiting for them to call me in for the big moment. </p>

<p>I prayed like a sinner on his death bed. During the pregnancy, people we know lost theirs. My wife and I never thought we would be able to have children. The fact that she got pregnant, much less with twins, was such an against-the-odds event that to this day I consider it yet further proof of God's existence. It felt like forever, but I probably only prayed for 5-6 minutes. Having promised God all but the Brooklyn Bridge, I was left with silence, save my pounding heart. I pulled out my cellphone and put on my New Vegas playlist. Ain't that a kick in the head.</p>

<p>After Tony Marcus ended his Lone Star serenade, a man came in and said "Are you ready, Dad?" Nobody has ever asked me anything of that importance before. "Please rise for the verdict" is a pittance in comparison to that feeling. I was about to walk into a room and have my entire life thrown on its ear.</p>

<p>I've been to every major league sporting event there is. NHL, MLB, NBA, NFL, all under the most brilliant illumination. And I thought I've seen every shade of white before. The surgical room was unnaturally white. Every surface seemed to possess an interstellar luminosity, recursively reflecting off each other in a blinding flash. It jars you. Your eyes cannot adjust fast enough, and when you regain focus, your wife is splayed open on a table, her innards hanging out of her midsection covered by a green gauze restricting your view of the gore. I remained seated at her side clasping those hands as so many times before while tears streamed down her face, numb from the neck down, waiting for our sons to come out into a beautiful, horrifying existence where Trump is the president-elect and a great many people on Earth would rather them be vivisected into a medical wastebasket by a Jewish abortionist.</p>

<p>Modern medicine is simply put jaw-dropping. Technology like this only exists vis-a-vis the white man and his civilization. Within a few minutes of holding my wife's hands and wiping the tears of pain and joy from her eyes, a nurse loudly calls out the time "12:08!" and suddenly up over the precipice of the surgical draping comes BABY A, mewling his disgust at being forcibly evicted from his /comfy/ fetal environment and thrust out into a cold, bright, sterile surgical planet where Donald Trump is president and I am evil for not wanting people who look like me bred out of existence. </p>

<p>You will never in your entire life experience a sensation as singularly awe-inspiring as looking into the eyes of your newborn child.</p>

<p>It was all I could do to hold back tears of joy. A newborn child is covered in an ashy white substance. It's skin has splotches of red and shades of purple, a slight tinge of blood from the uterine sac in which it once lived. The child cannot open its eyes and screams to the high heavens, it is a wet, dirty, loud thing and it is the most beautiful sight in all of God's creation.</p>

<p>And then I got to experience it again 3 minutes later at 12:11pm.</p>

<p>A screaming newborn is one of the most heartwarming sounds you can hear. It tells you that your baby was born healthy and alive, and those lungs were working very hard that day. A little too hard.</p>

<p><strong><em>NO REST FOR THE WEARY</em></strong></p>

<p>NICU lay just down the hall across the MBU (mother-baby unit). As I proudly led the Y-chromosome train back to the MBU suite, pushing the medical cart holding my boys in a bassinet, one of them was making little cute noises as he breathed. I didn't think much of it, the soft "Aaaa's" just being part and parcel of adorable infancy. After my wife was rolled in and helped into her bed to begin the recovery process, the on-call pediatrician came in to examine the boys. He was a little concerned about the Aaaa's. He called it "grunting." </p>

<p>Twins never go full term (40 weeks.) All along, the obstetrician said if we made it to 36 weeks we were champions in his book. The boys were born at 37 weeks 4 days. Still, this is technically premature. Most twins don't go past 32 weeks, and they have to spend time at the hospital finishing the development they would normally get as a singleton in their mother's womb. The larger of the two babies was born 7 pounds 7 ounces, and the smaller was 6 pounds 9 ounces. These are not small by any standards, and for twins they were giants. Still, their lungs had fluid in them. Combine their slight underdevelopment with the fact that birth was non-vaginal, there was a lot of squeezing they missed out on. As the doctor's explained, the babies are like wet sponges, and when they are pushed out, the fluid in the lungs is expelled, which is why they aspirate babies immediately upon birth. None of this mattered to me though. As they wheeled my two newborn sons off to the dreaded NICU, my wife ordered me to follow and not to leave until answers were had. </p>

<p>I frequently have to tell clients who have never been to court not to get upset and overwhelmed at the whole thing. Going to court is like taking a dump, a familiar, instinctual thing complete with shitty smells. I can't get some clients to avoid being terrified at the prospect, though. Well, here the roles were reversed. I was the one shaking in my size 13's. It was unfamiliar and frightening. My sons were deficient somehow. They had to be in "intensive care." I held my own in the room, alone with the boys, for only a few minutes. When my Aunt came in, I broke down in tears, crying into her shoulder. I shed 4-5 tears when I found out my wife was pregnant. Prior to that, I shed a tear at our wedding. Prior to that, I hadn't cried for years save for the occasion of my mother's death in 2003. </p>

<p>But at that moment on December 5, 2016, I was a bawling fool. The emotion of it all, the unnecessary fear, seeing tubes going into hands and mouths to help the babies breathe while keeping them fed and hydrated, resting atop warmers like wrapped burgers at a fast food joint. I needed to cry. Sometimes a man is entitled to it, and I think this is a qualifying instance. After a couple minutes I regained composure and set in for what turned out to be two nights in the NICU. </p>

<p>In the end, it was all in the margin of error. This NICU stay was entirely expected, and as the pediatrician told me, the boys would have fully functioning lungs in a matter of a few days. I felt somewhat ashamed at my emotional display. Elsewhere in the NICU, there were babies in far worse a situation than mine. I didn't know the specifics, but looking in on them gave me pause to reflect on the fragility of life. </p>

<p>Our first night together as a family in the hospital was a harbinger of what was to come once we got home. There's plenty of time to sleep when you're dead, or so they say. Newborns don't know anything when they come out. See, I cut off their food supply when I severed their umbilical cords.  They don't know about milk and nipples and how to eat. They have to learn. They also don't know about sleeping 8 hours a night. They have to learn that too. And the former comes a lot sooner than the latter. </p>

<p>Sleep has become our most treasured commodity. At best, the boys sleep in 2-3 hour blocks. Beginning that night, as we desperately tried to get the boys to nurse past the colostrum in my wife's bosom, I have averaged about 5 hours of sleep a night, in 1-3 hour blocks. I was nearly killed in a car accident last week when I caught myself about to doze off in traffic just in time to slam on the Camaro's brakes, somehow missing the stopped car in front of me by what must have been centimeters. You have to come up with a strategy on how to get babies to sleep. Here's a tip: only feed them formula at night when you want to get that first block of sleep. Babies eat a lot. Every 3 hours they're starving to death and usually soaked in their own piss and shit. They immediately let you know that the situation needs remedy, and that notice normally comes several times a night. </p>

<p>My wife breastfeeds and bottle-feeds as much as she can. Breast milk is perfect because 1. It's free, and 2. It's packed with nutrients and antibodies and everything a baby needs. However, with two, you never really develop the stockpile you want, and if my wife doesn't pump every 3-4 hours her chest is sore and painful. Still, the breast milk doesn't cause the gas as much as formula, and it's lightweight. It looks mostly like 1% or skim milk you might see at the grocery store. Formula, however, looks more like thick whipping cream. So the strategy comes with giving them a good dose of the heavy stuff late at night so it weighs in their bellies like lead, and keeps them down a good length of time. My wife came up with the idea (I'm sure she isn't the first) and damn if it doesn't work well; I got all 5.5 hours last night in one block from 12am to 5:30am. </p>

<p>And you combine this constant need to change diapers and feed and burp and put back to sleep with my wife's healing. The surgical wound needs cleaning, and due to the surgery she is essentially having a 3 week period at this point from the internal healing and readjustment. It's a team effort. You cannot be shy about any of this. You have to learn to change a diaper in 45 seconds. You have to watch out and not get fire-hosed by your newborn son. Your wife is going to turn super bitchy when you hold the baby slightly wrong. You will not get sleep. You will beg for sleep and it will avoid you. You won't have time for golf or vidya or anything because when you're not busy feeding or changing the baby, you will be trying to catch up laundry or housecleaning or making sure the bills are paid. You will catch yourself napping at 6pm when you get home from work, and then dealing with the baby situation until almost midnight. Your entire metabolism will change. You will lose your appetite and drop a drastic amount of weight. I have lost nearly 20 pounds in less than 3 weeks since the surgery. Food doesn't interest me nearly as much as it did, and I am more obsessed than ever in making sure my men are coming along as they should. It's a parental instinct kicking in. An internal voice that makes you want to protect your children and your family and make sure they have what they need. My Christmas will consist of packs of underwear and socks and some new shoes from wal mart. My boys will have a closet full of every stitch of clothing they will need for the next 9 months. Their nursery is filled with thousands of diapers of every size. I may not get to play a full round of golf for months. I will do with less to make sure my wife is comfortable and my kids are clothed, fed, and happy, and now, more than ever, my life is fulfilled. I have more purpose than ever, and by making sure these guys grow up to be proper white men, I am doing my part in ensuring a future for all whites, whether Trump is president or not. </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alt-Right Advice: First Edition]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Waifus,</p>

<p>My niece has started dating outside her race and my stomach is thoroughly turned. Her father is a blue pilled liberal faggot and he's raised her accordingly. I want to intervene but I don't know how.</p>

<p>They live on the other side of the country so I don't</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/22/untitled-14/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">37cff2c9-a1eb-4baf-a8ae-7ba828824633</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfie James & Cecilia Davenport]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:33:08 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Waifus,</p>

<p>My niece has started dating outside her race and my stomach is thoroughly turned. Her father is a blue pilled liberal faggot and he's raised her accordingly. I want to intervene but I don't know how.</p>

<p>They live on the other side of the country so I don't get many opportunities to talk to her, but the holidays are here and the family is gathering. This will be my best chance for a face to face intervention.</p>

<p>My instinct is to scream "You're taking part in the genocide of own people!" but I suspect that won't gain much traction.</p>

<p>How do I talk her down from this before it's too late?</p>

<p>Sincerely, <br>
Horrified Uncle</p>

<p>Dear Horrified Uncle,</p>

<p>I’m sorry to hear about your viscerally painful issue. There are several variables here that aren’t in your favor – you don’t live near her, you’re not her father, and she was raised by a shitlib. So what’s in order is to step into a Jew’s shoes and play a long game of emotional manipulation – on both her <em>and</em> her dad. </p>

<p><strong>Your mission is to plant seeds of doubt within them both without setting off tripwires and ruining Christmas.</strong> Time isn’t on your side, and you’re not going to redpill either of them in one visit. But a white father can find his way to rationality and discover his innate racial/tribal instincts; if you can turn him, he’s in a far better position to exorcise the pozz from his daughter. </p>

<p><em>Take it easy at first.</em> If you start hurling coal-burning stats and lecturing about white genocide, they’ll peg you as a crazy racist and will shut you out for the rest of the visit.</p>

<p>Remind your niece that you care about her and respect her, but you’re curious: what’s with the new boyfriend? Isn’t it a little uncomfortable dating a black guy? Be prepared for the eye rolls that result from any pro-white rhetoric, but you’re used to that. Stay cool, and pretend to respect her responses while sticking to reason. Contrary to what she thinks, <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/">only seven percent of whites in the United States marry outside their race</a> – a far cry from what the Jewtube leads her to believe is natural.</p>

<p><em>Prey on your niece’s natural insecurities and vanity.</em>  Doesn’t she notice the looks she gets when out with him?  Doesn’t she want kids who look like her? Does she really want mixed-race children who won’t belong in either black or white culture, who will lack a distinct identity? You might turn her against you for now – something we’ve all experienced in dealing with the blue-pilled in our lives. But you’ll have struck a blow for our people if she’s at least mulling over mudsharking consequences on her flight home.</p>

<p>I’m guessing you’ve already tried converting the dad at some point, but now that his daughter is at stake, you’ve got a powerful new discussion point. If he can turn a blind eye to the very real likelihood his daughter will get a black eye from this rebellion, then he deserves the pain that is coming his way.</p>

<p>After all, it’s wholly unnatural for a man to see his lily-white girl with a negroid, regardless of how progressive he thinks he is. Since he’s a man, he is capable of absorbing facts without automatically getting triggered. Persuade him, light that fire in him, and you’ll greatly improve your chances of breaking the miscegenation spell.</p>

<p>Whatever you do, don’t push too hard and drive your niece back into the dindu’s unnaturally long arms. Her defiant flings could very well result in her death (sorry), and you don’t want to play a part in that. You want to sleep easy knowing that you tried. Good luck, Goy. Let us know how it turns out. –WJ</p>

<p>Hi Waifus,</p>

<p>What is the average velocity of an unladen Jew?</p>

<p>Thanks, <br>
Howe</p>

<p>Hello Howe,</p>

<p>I would assume there are many variables that go into such a calculation: height, weight, sex, launching device, trajectory, wind speed, drag, aerodynamics and more. The waifus are simply unequipped to provide an answer with our lady brains. Would you consider performing many such tests and reporting back? –WJ</p>

<p>Hey there Waifus!</p>

<p>I live in Southern Commiefornia. I'm engaged to lovely woman who thinks my views are repulsive. I've tried to explain my side of a number of situations (Dakota Pipeline, Economics, Culture, Racial issues, Muslims etc.) No matter how strong my arguments are with her, I get nowhere. Nothing. Not even the tiniest budge. Every time something comes up in the news that relates to something we've already talked about, she brings up the same arguments as if I haven't explained the issue before. This is a big thorn in the side of our relationship. There are times that I think leaving her would be better instead of subjecting myself (and her) to this conflict we have. I would love for her to see things with our lens but I understand that doing so would result in a major downgrade for her in social capital as all her friends are liberals. What to do?</p>

<p>Thanks</p>

<p>Brutal Marz</p>

<p>Dear Brutal,</p>

<p>Allow me to be brutal. </p>

<p>Granted, I don’t know all the circumstances; you’re engaged, so you two are clearly serious about each other, and there are strong feelings involved. Breaking off an engagement is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_Iy5xMeaP8">serious business</a>, but you’re not married yet. <strong>I would suggest to you that there are two things you need to think (and/or pray) long and hard about.</strong> </p>

<p>The first is about your happiness. Now, marriage isn’t all about you. In some ways, it’s about society and posterity far more than it is about you—but we’ll get to that in a moment. I don’t usually go to Nietzsche as my first source for advice about courtship and marriage, but when it came to selecting a spouse, I think he got it spot on in <em>Human All-Too-Human</em>: </p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>Marriage as a long conversation.</em> When marrying, one should ask oneself this question: Do you believe that you will be able to converse well with this woman into your old age? Everything else in marriage is transitory, but the most time during the association belongs to conversation.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In brief: when you grow old with her, what will you talk about?</p>

<p>If you don’t like Nietzsche, let’s try someone else. In his <em>Nicomachean Ethics</em>, Aristotle describes three types of friendship, in ascending order: friendship of utility, friendship of pleasure, and friendship of goodness. The third type is extremely rare; almost no one finds it. There are good things about all three kinds of friendship. But the third type, even if it can be achieved only partially, is deeply rewarding, for when two souls can agree on and share in the goods that they hold dear—ideas about virtue and the best way of life, which are really the essence of politics—then life can truly be fulfilling. There’s nothing better than this. </p>

<p>I’m not counseling you to look for perfection, or a “soulmate” (whatever that means). But consider that this may not be a recipe for happiness. </p>

<p>But there’s a second consideration, and this is actually the far more important one. After all, one can choose to tolerate many annoyances for the sake of other goods (for example, I’m guessing she’s a very attractive woman). <strong>Nevertheless, the most important question you must ask yourself is this: Is this the woman you want raising your children?</strong> Can you live with the fact that she will, very likely, teach them to hate the things you love? Your duty is first to them, before yourself. Have you talked with her about how you will raise your children? That might be a good place to start working through some of these questions and finding out if you two are really going to be able to survive the long haul. </p>

<p>Look, in some ways, our ancestors had it easier: get married and then figure out if you like each other. But for better or worse, we have the tragic luxury of torturing ourselves. Make sure this is what you want. –CD </p>

<p>Hi again, waifus.</p>

<p>What is your favorite color?</p>

<p>Thanks, <br>
Howe</p>

<p>Dear Howe,</p>

<p>W H I T E <br>
H <br>
I <br>
T <br>
E <br>
–WJ &amp; CD</p>

<p>Dear Waifus,</p>

<p>I’m an AltRight grill on the younger side, just kind of getting started in the movement. I know that I want to marry a fashy goy, and I want to sooner rather than later. I don’t think finding one will be a problem, but what character traits should I be looking for? In your opinions, when you’re deciding whether or not to marry a man, what is the most important quality for him to have? </p>

<p>Keen on Tying the Knot in Kansas</p>

<p>Dear KtKK,</p>

<p>There are a thousand practical considerations, but assuming compatibility and agreement on the kind of life you want, and how to raise your children, it seems to me that the most important quality at the end of the day is loyalty. Will he cut and run when things get hard? As much as we’ve tried to conquer nature, events happen in life that we simply cannot control. Will he stand by you when things get hard? It may be hard to know, but that’s what I’d look for. –CD </p>

<p>I’d consider being faithful, trustworthy, dependable and supportive (both emotionally and financially) to be character traits of utmost importance for a marriage. I’m assuming you intend to have as many Kind, Kansan Kids as possible in order to do your part in saving the white race, so you’ve got to be able to count on him. While the traits themselves seem dull, it doesn’t mean your Chad will be boring; it just means he’s got the agency to sustain a family - especially if you intend to become a trad wife. If it’s perhaps too hard to determine whether he’s got all these traits early on in your courtship, take note of his physical appearance. A guy who takes care of himself by being in shape and dressing well is more likely to take care of his family too. Also? Make sure he’s good with money before exchanging rings. –WJ</p>

<p>Hi Waifus,</p>

<p>I have a question. Can women be wooed with anti-Semitic poetry? For example (not my original work; credit goes to @harrison_partch):</p>

<p>Roses are red <br>
Ovens are warm <br>
The Jew is a devil <br>
In human form</p>

<p>Thanks, <br>
Howe</p>

<p>Hi again Howe,</p>

<p>If anti-semitism is considered by you to be a fine feature in a woman, then she would definitely be wooed by that poem. Test it out on every woman you meet; the one who responds positively is a keeper. –WJ</p>

<p><em>(Note from the authoresses: Please be assured that we have received all your questions and will attempt to answer all of them—all the serious ones anyway, and most of the funny ones. You just may have to wait for a future column to get your answer. Please keep them coming: askwaifus@yandex.com)</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Xenoskepticism is a Good Rule of Thumb]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>History is full of uncanny patterns. Either we’ve learned nothing as a species or things are repeating themselves. Time is cyclical or man is forgetful. Maybe there is a “natural law” at work or something like that. Or maybe not. Nailing these down with precision is honestly not all</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/21/xenoskepticism-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">aadf90df-d6f8-46c0-8f34-35ee7c1097ab</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence Murray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:45:06 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/The-Janissaries-Patrol-Izmir.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/The-Janissaries-Patrol-Izmir.jpg" alt="Xenoskepticism is a Good Rule of Thumb"><p>History is full of uncanny patterns. Either we’ve learned nothing as a species or things are repeating themselves. Time is cyclical or man is forgetful. Maybe there is a “natural law” at work or something like that. Or maybe not. Nailing these down with precision is honestly not all that important though. Ideas have consequences sure, but ideas also have antecedents. They are chained together over the course of civilizations. And one of the most eternal recurrences is that of precarious elites importing human resources from other tribes than their own.</p>

<p>Whether this is a good or a bad thing depends on how one relates to that authority and his views on how a society should be ordered, as well as the historical context. Perhaps the elites did not feel safe relying on their own countrymen. Perhaps the outsiders  were particularly skilled at something the locals could not provide. Perhaps falling back on <em>divide et impera</em> was not only the simplest way to maintain order but also the most effective. Maybe a deficit just needed to be filled.</p>

<p>The Achaemenid army consisted of an ethnic Persian core surrounded by the levies of <a href="http://therightstuff.biz/2016/10/02/western-trophies-2016-our-modern-marathon/">conquered nations</a>. The late Roman army was heavily non-Italic and included large contingents of Germans and Illyrians. The Byzantine emperor had a royal guard—the Varangian Guard—composed mostly of Norsemen, and later on even Anglo-Saxons. Powerful Irish chiefs would retain bands of <em>gallowglass</em>, or “foreign Gaels” from Scotland as their personal troops. The Doge of Venice recruited men from Istria and Dalmatia (Croatia), called <em>schiavoni</em> in Italian, to defend his palace. The Pope’s foreign retinues are perhaps the most famous, the Swiss Guard. The Mongol conquerors of China in the thirteenth century brought over a number of Muslims and other non-Han peoples to help them govern their new lands. The Ottoman sultan would abduct young Balkan Christian men to serve as soldiers and administrators of his empire, known to posterity as <em>janissaries</em>.</p>

<p>The American War of Independence was primarily <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/anglo-american-diversity/">led by Cavaliers while fought by Borderers</a>, leading at least one foreign observer to remark that it was a “Irish-Scotch Presbyterian rebellion” against England. Adding to the ethnic quirks of this conflict, for her part, England brought over German Hessian mercenaries to fight the separatists. Almost a century later during the American Civil War, the Union was able to muster a larger army due to decades of mass migration from Ireland and Germany, and by raising black regiments to fight the Southern confederates. Austria-Hungary elevated divide and rule to an art, always stationing troops and state police of different nationalities from the areas they were responsible for (e.g. Germans in Italy, Hungarians in Bohemia, and so forth). After the first world war, the Allies made a point of placing colonial African troops in Germany’s occupied Rhineland.</p>

<p>The <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/01/27/an-occupied-country/">United States government</a>, through the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and refugee resettlement programs, likes to put ethnic minorities into the middle of homogeneous, often conservative, White areas (whether these transplants are sourced locally or from abroad). The government also issues H1B1 visas to predominantly Indian (South Asian) migrants so they can work in the technology and corporate administration sectors of the American economy. A Jew always runs the Federal Reserve, and three out of the eight <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/02/02/constitutional-logic-and-the-sanhedrin/">Supreme Court</a> justices are Jewish (Obama's nominee Merrick Garland is a <em>mischling</em>).</p>

<p><a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/proverbs-of-a-xenoskeptic-ethno-nationalist/">Xenoskepticism</a> is the ordinary idea that just maybe we should be a little bit more critical when someone in a position of power tells us that foreigners are the best thing ever or starts to rely on them increasingly. If you’ve heard that the American economy would collapse without illegal immigrants picking fruit in California, or that foreign-born people (often Russian Jews, Chinese, or Indians) make better entrepreneurs, or that immigrants just have better families than Americans do, you’ve been fed justification for the status quo by someone who benefits from it. In the legal world, that’s considered a conflict of interest.</p>

<p>I don’t like the term <em>xenophobia</em>. I’m not irrationally afraid of people who aren’t like me. I'm not afraid of them, period. The smarmy, irony-steeped numales and catladies who upbraid the men of the right for being “afraid of new things” or “racist” are just demonstrating that their ability to do risk assessment or perimeter defense is grossly impaired and compromised. Virtue-signaling is the way of the pharisee. We know that these people are in fact quite uncomfortable with vibrancy, since they move away from it when they want to start a family or earn enough money. Supporting the idea of diversity is often sufficient enough for them, let others experience it. Let others deal with militarized police and the impact of counter-terrorism. Let others deal with failing schools and high crime. Let others deal with stagnant wages and increased competition in the labor market. Let others deal with <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/12/03/anomie-anime-and-the-alt-right/">anomie</a>.</p>

<p>The xenophile fancies himself a progressive and enlightened critical thinker, but the reality is that merely his brain can take a heavier load of cognitive dissonance.</p>

<p>The xenoskeptic on the other hand, notices that the elites of his society—whom many already regard with suspicion if not outright ire—have become great moral defenders of foreigners. He believes that this relationship has both cause and consequences. He knows he is not the primary benefactor of this relationship, and he is right. It’s not a coincidence. No one asked him whether <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/what-new-yorks-chattering-class-gets-wrong-about-israel/">Israel</a> was our greatest ally, if <a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/dont-tread-on-dhimmi/">Islam</a> is a religion of peace, or if he wants his neighborhood to become mestizo.</p>

<p>Why does the prince surround himself with foreign bodyguards? And why should we wait for the day when we are ruled by transgender communist mamluks?</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Also published at <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/">Atlantic Centurion</a></span>.</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amoris Laetitia: Why it Matters to the Alt Right]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As the Roman Catholic Church continues its pitiful descent from the pre-eminent institution in Western Civilization into a glorified NGO, its internal debates are easier and easier to ignore.  That four prominent cardinals recently issued a formal Dubia (a request for clarification) regarding Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> has</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/21/untitled-11/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">75ebf44e-806b-40d9-bf19-744ed87209c2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PostConservative]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:05:59 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Roman Catholic Church continues its pitiful descent from the pre-eminent institution in Western Civilization into a glorified NGO, its internal debates are easier and easier to ignore.  That four prominent cardinals recently issued a formal Dubia (a request for clarification) regarding Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> has received scant attention from the secular press.</p>

<p>When it is mentioned at all, <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> itself—a  radical departure from traditional Catholic doctrine regarding marriage, divorce, and access to the sacraments—is generally portrayed as part of the inevitable “progress” of the Church towards a kinder, gentler Catholicism, more in harmony with the modern world.  Pope Francis remains one of the most popular figures in the world, with approval ratings that would make even Vladimir Putin envious. <br>
Within Catholic circles, however, the matter of the Dubia is practically the only story worth following these days.  Despite its façade of tranquil piety and mind-numbing bureaucracy, the Vatican has always been a cauldron of political and theological intrigue.  The time-honored tradition of <em>romanitas</em>—a sort of Borgian ruthlessness conducted under a code of <em>omertà</em>—has governed Vatican politics for nearly two millenia.  Many inside the Church, for example, knew full well that there were organized networks of satanic pederasts that had infiltrated the chanceries and seminaries in the years following Vatican II, but it wasn’t until the secular press broke the story that the Church began speaking openly about it.  Even so, a full accounting has never been made and likely never will be.</p>

<p>Thus, when the four cardinals went public with their concerns over <em>Amoris Laetitia</em>, it represented a significant break from the traditional rules of combat.  An escalation, you might say.  Watchful people took notice.  What could this mean?  </p>

<p>Supporters of Pope Francis, who was installed by a group of modernists clerics that calls itself the <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-anti-benedict-conspiracy/">St. Gallen Mafia</a>, took to Twitter, creating sock accounts to denounce the four Cardinals as “heretics and schismatics,” using charged language from the Lord of the Rings to describe them as “witless worms.”  Some suggested that they could be de-frocked for their insolence.  So much for <em>romanitas</em> in the age of social media.  Francis himself stepped up his efforts to remake the Curia in his own image, removing prominent traditionalists from key positions and elevating sympathetic liberals in their place.  Meanwhile, he has steadfastly refused to answer the Dubia, displaying an appalling rudeness and lack of pastoral responsibility.  The policy of St. Peter’s successor is ecumenism and apologies for all... except, it seems, for those who cling to Catholic tradition. <br>
At any rate, it seems clear that the long cold war within the Church has gone hot.  As always, the outcome of this war within the Church will have significant implications for Western Civilization as a whole.</p>

<p>At the heart of the Dubia and <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> is the Catholic concept of sacramental marriage.  Now, sacramental marriage in the West has always had its quirks.  It is not truly “eternal,” in the same way as, say, traditional Hindu marriage, where wives would voluntarily self-immolate after the death of their husbands.  Since the Reformation, sacramental marriage has taken hit after hit.  Arranged marriages gave way to romantic matches.  Women were ushered into the workforce and away from their traditional roles as mothers and home-makers.  Mainline Protestant denominations, which as recently as 50 years ago were united with the Roman Catholic Church in opposing contraception and divorce, now fully embrace the modern, concepts of “family planning” and marriage as a vehicle for personal happiness.  Today, marriage has essentially the same legal and moral status as a cellular phone contract.  Inconvenient but not impossible to break, it exists for the pleasure and fulfillment of the husband and wife (or husband and husband or wife and wife).  Children are optional.</p>

<p>In fact, the only prominent institution that continues to resist romantic-hedonic marriage is the Roman Church.  So naturally, this has to change.  Enter <em>Amoris Laetitia</em>. <br>
The practical effect of <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> is to make it easier—perhaps even commonplace—for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive communion.  Much of the trouble arises from a single footnote, allegedly added by Francis himself:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>“Because forms of conditioning and mitigating factors, it is possible that in an objective situation of sin – which may not be subjectively culpable, or fully such – a person can be living in God’s grace, can love and can also grow in the life of grace and charity, while receiving the Church’s help to this end.</p>
  
  <p>"In certain cases, this can include the help of the sacraments. Hence, “I want to remind priests that the confessional must not be a torture chamber, but rather an encounter with the Lord’s mercy” (Apostolic Exhortation <em>Evangelii Gaudium</em> [24 November 2013], 44: AAS 105 [2013], 1038). I would also point out that the Eucharist “is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak” (ibid., 47: 1039).”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Now, it must be said that divorced Catholics have always had access to the sacraments, provided that they live ‘in a state of complete [sexual] continence.”  (<em>Familiaris Consortio</em>, Pope John Paul II, 1984.)  Thus one cannot claim that <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> is merely an opening up of the nourishment of the Eucharist for those who have been divorced.  Instead, it represents a fundamental change in the conditions of access to the sacraments (i.e., the removal of the requirement for sexual continence).  How else can one explain this except by concluding that the Pope also wishes to change the nature of Catholic sacramental marriage?  </p>

<p>Indeed, the potential damage goes far beyond marriage and to the nature of the sacraments themselves.  If, as the document suggests, it possible to live in an objective situation of sin and still receive the sacraments, how then can the Church justifying denying them to, say, atheists or Buddhists?  To apostates?  To practicing homosexuals or pederasts?  <em>Amoris Laetitia</em>, in its desperation to extend the unhappy legacy of Vatican II, de-Catholicizes the sacraments and elevates “personal conscience” over the teachings of the Magisterium and doctrine itself.  There is a word for this.  That word is “Protestantism.”</p>

<p>I mean no offense to my Protestant brothers and sisters, but ecumenism has its limits.  In terms of its liturgy, its theology, its politics, its sense of the divine, its catechesis, and its understanding of human nature, the post-conciliar Church is already closer to Martin Luther than to Pope Gregory the Great.  This mirrors what the post-Catholic theologian Hans Kung reportedly told Cardinal Bea at the outset of the Council, when the Cardinal fretted over the possibility of schism: “You misunderstand, Eminence.  We don’t intend to leave this time.  This time, we will stay and the Church will change according to our plan” (reported by Fr. Malachi Martin, Cardinal Bea’s chief advisor at the council).</p>

<p>It is virtually axiomatic on the Right to say that “the family is the basic building block of society.”  And indeed the facts support this—divorce is the common thread linking <a href="http://www.children-and-divorce.com/children-divorce-statistics.html">a host of social problems</a>.  Women whose parents divorced are themselves 60% more likely to divorce than the general population.  Divorce has the characteristics of a virus (or a generational sin) in that it is self-propagating.  Untreated, it soon infects the entire body of society.</p>

<p>But why should any of this matter to the Alt Right, to Protestants, atheists, Neopagans, and esoteric Kekists?  All we care about is saving our race and securing the future for our children, right?</p>

<p>It matters because politics is downstream from faith and culture.</p>

<p>Consider the state of our people:  we are marrying later and later, having fewer children, divorcing more often, and sterilizing ourselves at alarming rates.  As a voting bloc, single white women are nearly as devoted to the Democratic party as urban blacks.  The children of divorce are more likely to be liberal, atheistic, single, and emotionally damaged.  Pornography has proliferated to such an extent that it is virtually ubiquitous.  As many as one in four girls is a victim of sexual assault (a number that will surely increase as the Mohammedans enter our countries in large numbers).</p>

<p>Young people growing up in this toxic stew report that it is increasingly difficult to make a good marriage.  With so many damaged people around, who can blame them for “opting out?”</p>

<p>Now, it would be foolish to blame all of this on the decline of sacramental marriage.  In many respects, it is simply part of the inexorable descent into what René Guénon called the “pit of quantity” that characterizes virtually every field of human activity in this Kali Yuga.  </p>

<p>But if we truly believe that the family is the basic building block of society, then is it any wonder that our enemies have made it their chief target?  Their vision has always been clear: a society of atomized, interchangeable economic units completely divorced, you might say, from any larger purpose.  Marriage, for such a people, could not be anything OTHER than a tenuous economic alliance between taxable entities.  A society that indoctrinates its children from the earliest possible age that life is a quest for happiness and “personal fulfillment” cannot simultaneously expect them to stay in “difficult marriages.”  And as any married person will tell you, ALL marriages are difficult.</p>

<p>See through this lens, <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> represents a greater threat to marriage (and therefore to a healthy society) than even the “homosexual union” movement.  Why?  Because it is the complete capitulation of the last cultural bulwark for sacramental marriage to the culture of personal fulfillment.  It is one thing for the secular Left to continue to modify our laws to favor homosexuals and for homosexuals to mock the institution of marriage from the outside.  It is quite another for the Church to abandon 2,000 years of doctrine in a pontifical footnote.</p>

<p>The stakes couldn’t be higher, which explains why we have seen an escalation of the internal war in the Vatican over the matter.  The modernists sense an opportunity for a decapitation stroke, while embattled traditionalists understand that if they lose this one, there may be no coming back.</p>

<p>If politics is downstream from culture and theology, then it follows that our struggle for the political well-being of our people is secondary to the spiritual war being waged against them.  <em>Amoris Laetitia</em> represents a major escalation in that spiritual war.  As such it matters gravely to us all.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The trillion dollar question.</p>

<p>There is a problem in Europe.  A massive one. And no one has been capable or strong enough to solve it.</p>

<p>We’ll see what the future brings, but I’ve got a few ideas that I believe would completely solve the crisis.</p>

<p>First, we have</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/20/untitled-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">8db470c9-7da3-456c-b4ce-74c9f71594c2</guid><category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category><category><![CDATA[editor's pick]]></category><category><![CDATA[Muslim migrant crisis]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markos Power]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:12:36 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/european-migrant-crisis-refugees-1024x683-1.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/european-migrant-crisis-refugees-1024x683-1.jpg" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis"><p>The trillion dollar question.</p>

<p>There is a problem in Europe.  A massive one. And no one has been capable or strong enough to solve it.</p>

<p>We’ll see what the future brings, but I’ve got a few ideas that I believe would completely solve the crisis.</p>

<p>First, we have to define the problem.</p>

<h2 id="howtosolvetheeuropeanmigrantcrisistheproblem">How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis: The Problem</h2>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/european-migrant-crisis-refugees-1024x683.jpg" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis">
What we have occurring right now is that:</p>

<ul>
<li>Millions of Muslims, mostly young men, have flooded and are still flooding into Europe.
These Muslim men are travelling from hundreds, if not thousands of miles away  </li>
<li>These Muslim men are mostly coming from Pakistan, Afghanistan, North and Sub-Saharan Africa (IE: not coming from Syria)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.purposetopower.com/german-refugees-why-is-germany-letting-them-in/" target="_blank">These Muslim men are causing massive problems to the societies they are entering </a></li>
</ul>

<p>There are huge problems in regard to all crime, but specifically <strong>sexual assaults and rape.</strong> </p>

<p>Why is that?</p>

<h3 id="theseyoungmuslimmenfeellikeconquerors">These Young Muslim Men Feel Like Conquerors</h3>

<p>If you’ve ever traveled a great distance outdoors- such as a long bike ride, hiking, exploring, or went on a far away vacation; you may know what I’m talking about.</p>

<p>These men trudged through rough terrain, slept in crappy conditions, and exposed themselves to all the natural elements before they arrived at their destination (mostly in Germany).</p>

<p>They went through (in their mind) hostile Christian lands before arriving in Germany. (<em>Side note: Perhaps if these lands were truly hostile we wouldn't have had this crisis in the first place.</em>)</p>

<p>All of this exercise, travel difficulties, and travel experiences have greatly jacked up their dopamine and dopamine receptors. </p>

<p>Strenuous exercise, new experiences, and adversity greatly increase dopamine and dopamine receptors in the brain.</p>

<p>On top of that- many of these men truly believe that they are there to settle (and eventually) claim these lands for Islam.</p>

<p>Accomplishment: achieving what you set out to do- also <strong>gives you a huge spike in dopamine.</strong></p>

<p>(Quick note: dopamine is the neurochemical that gives you motivation and drive)</p>

<h4 id="butthatsnotallmoreimportantly">But that’s not all.  More importantly:</h4>

<p>So, picture this:</p>

<p>You just traveled a great distance and overcame great adversity. You have seen and  accomplished more than most of your ancestors, and you know it. </p>

<p>You finally arrive at your destination and, while you may feel a bit worn out, you feel great as you finally made it.</p>

<p>You are fit, looking good, and ready for any challenge out there.</p>

<p><strong>And because of the above- your sex drive is extremely high and you are very horny.</strong> </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/refugees-welcome-300x300.png" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis"></p>

<p>Now, you also see hundreds of attractive, young, scantily dressed (compared to what you are used to) European Christian women walking around.</p>

<p>You’ve heard that they are easy, and also heard that many of them invited you in. Some of them even greeted you at the train station on your way into the country. </p>

<p>Since you are very confident and feel great, are fit, and don’t really care about these women, you will make advances.</p>

<p>Also, since Muslims treat their women very different than Western Men do, you weren’t really taught nor care about sexual harassment, being ‘creepy’ and/or rape.</p>

<p>Besides, they are just Christian, not Muslim, women.</p>

<p><strong>To you- women are meant to submit to men at all times; and since you’re feeling powerful- you assume that they should submit to you.</strong> </p>

<h2 id="howtosolvetheproblem">How To Solve The Problem</h2>

<p><strong>1. Teach the Muslim Immigrants about the importance of feminism and the dangers of rape culture</strong></p>

<p>By getting the Muslim men to buy into feminism, and how men are dangerous rapists, you can help combat and reverse their strong features of masculinity. Get them to feel guilty for being men.</p>

<p>Get the men to act more passively, and believe that women are just as good, if not better, than men at everything. </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/european-migrant-crisis-225x300.jpg" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis"></p>

<p><strong>2. Teach the Muslim Immigrants about their Muslim Guilt; Make Them Feel Ashamed of Their Past</strong></p>

<p>Tell them that their forefathers were homophobic, sexist, and racist. Tell them that their ancestors oppressed and slaughtered minorities, and that their whole past is made up of evil deeds.</p>

<p>Get them to work against their own interests, and only look to help out every other ethnic and religious group.</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/Muslim-Guilt.jpg" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis"></p>

<p><strong>3. Teach the Muslim Immigrants the Importance of LGBT</strong></p>

<p>Teach the men that homosexual relationships are just as good, if not better, than ones between a man and woman. That the outcomes and purpose of these relationships are equal. </p>

<p>Encourage these men to go into the LGBT community, and also encourage some of them to ‘come out’ and join the group.</p>

<p>Tell them that a homosexual lifestyle is just as good, if not better, than having a family. </p>

<p><strong>4. Teach the Muslim Immigrants the Importance of Secularism</strong> </p>

<p>Not only that, teach them how bad their religion is. How oppressive, racist, sexist, and homophobic it is.</p>

<p>Tell them that we no longer need God, because the State will guide your morality and protect you.</p>

<p><strong>5. Teach the Muslim Immigrants the Importance of ‘Nation Building’ and ‘Democracy’</strong></p>

<p>Teach them the importance of our Middle Eastern wars. How we needed to, and must, spread Democracy through out the region.</p>

<p>How we must protect our allies from these evil countries, and that it is worth the trillions of dollars we have to spend, and must continue to spend.</p>

<h2 id="thereality">The Reality</h2>

<p>The reality is that everything I listed is what caused the European Migrant Crisis in the first place.</p>

<p>How the European people, specifically White European men, have been brainwashed into believing things that go against their self interests as a people.</p>

<p>How every one of those points attack:</p>

<ul>
<li><strong>the European family</strong></li>
<li><strong>male and female relationships</strong></li>
<li><strong>being proud of your past and your heritage</strong></li>
<li><strong>the importance of marriage and family for the survival and continuance of your people</strong></li>
</ul>

<p>The 5 points above need to be discredited and reversed if the European Migrant Crisis is ever to be solved.</p>

<p>Men must become proud of their past. Men must be strong, brave, and reject propaganda.</p>

<h3 id="menmustbecomemenagain">Men must become men again</h3>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/We-Need-Men.jpg" alt="How To Solve The European Migrant Crisis"></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[THE DAILY SHOAH #116A: LAMPSHADE THE NATION]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The first of TWO episodes of The Daily Shoah for this week is available at <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/12/20/the-daily-shoah-116a-lampshade-the-nation/">Radio.TheRightStuff.Biz</a>.</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/20/the-daily-shoah-116a-lampshade-the-nation/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">3f53af5d-c5ce-4549-9eac-16db1ddd5afb</guid><category><![CDATA[The Daily Shoah]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seventh Son]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:57:19 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/TDS3VERT.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/TDS3VERT.png" alt="THE DAILY SHOAH #116A: LAMPSHADE THE NATION"><p>The first of TWO episodes of The Daily Shoah for this week is available at <a href="https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/12/20/the-daily-shoah-116a-lampshade-the-nation/">Radio.TheRightStuff.Biz</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Urbanization is a massive problem.</p>

<p>The major cities of America: New York, Los Angeles, and  Chicago are bastions of Cultural Marxism. From here is where the urban elite make plans to dictate to the rest of America, and scheme on how to shape the nation in their image.</p>

<p>What image</p>]]></description><link>http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/18/untitled-9/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">a03d6d20-cb8e-4d30-96c6-a8635ba7cfae</guid><category><![CDATA[urbanites]]></category><category><![CDATA[Cultural Marxism]]></category><category><![CDATA[editor's pick]]></category><category><![CDATA[Urban White Liberals]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markos Power]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:25:51 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/festivals-1.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/festivals-1.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose"><p>Urbanization is a massive problem.</p>

<p>The major cities of America: New York, Los Angeles, and  Chicago are bastions of Cultural Marxism. From here is where the urban elite make plans to dictate to the rest of America, and scheme on how to shape the nation in their image.</p>

<p>What image is that?</p>

<h2 id="urbaniteswishtocreateanurbanamerica">Urbanites Wish To Create an 'Urban America'</h2>

<p>I identified Urbanization as 1 of the 4 Major Power Centers of the Cultural Marxist Left in  <a href="http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/02/the-4-major-power-centers-of-the-globalist-left/" target="_blank">this article.</a></p>

<p>Urban centers are places where White Liberals, SJWs, urban elites, homosexuals, and non-Whites congregate to implement their Cultural Marxist programs. These cities are very diverse (diversity meaning fewer Whites) and socially liberal (of the Cultural Marxist variety).</p>

<p>Much of the reason for the constant Liberal outcry because of the election of Donald Trump is that they can't see how anyone could have voted for him. They live in an urban bubble where most everyone is a conformist; they all believe in the Leftist Cultural Marxist ideology of pro-feminism, pro-homosexuality, pro-diveristy (fewer Whites), and especially the <strong>idea of living in and for the moment.</strong> </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/th_multicultural-friends.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose" title=""> <br>
                   <em>"New" America: Multi-Cult America</em></p>

<p>Urbanites are surrounded by other people who think the same way as  they do, and can't understand how Trump won. They can't seem to wrap their heads around the idea that millions and millions of Americans reject their Cultural Marxist beliefs.</p>

<p>As I said above, they are conformists to the greatest degree. They regurgitate the same talking points that the Corporate Media tells them to say. They believe that since all the Cultural Marxist ideas are 'popular', they must be right and that everyone must conform to them. They wish to create an America that is one big New York City. </p>

<p>Now that I've given a little background to the average urbanite mindset, let's look into one specific group: The White Urban Liberal.</p>

<h2 id="whiteurbanliberalsarechildren">White Urban Liberals are Children</h2>

<p>Big cities do have a lot of power and clout in their respective states, and even nationally. They have enough power to sway State elections  from Red to Blue. If you took away Chicago and New York City, Illinois and New York would be red states.</p>

<p>Much of the economic activity, and in turn what makes these cities powerful, is all because of the economic productivity of  the White Urban Liberals who live there. </p>

<p>These White Urban Liberals (WULs) usually move from their small towns and suburbs to the big city. One of the main reasons given for this move is because of a job opportunity. </p>

<p>I would argue that the WULs move to the city in order to <strong>avoid accepting any responsibility.</strong></p>

<p>Again, WULs are almost all conformists in the strictest sense. These are your sports watching, beer drinking, molly taking and weed smoking, PUA (Pick Up Artist) shitlibs.</p>

<p>They are the ones that buy into what the Corporate Media has told them to believe: that the next logical step after college is to <strong>move to the big city.... in order to extend this infantile and adolescent lifestyle.</strong> </p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/festivals.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose">
  <em>Just part of the urban lifestyle.. what you're not doing this? You must be lame.</em></p>

<p>They won't ever come out and admit this, of course. But, if you just look at their lifestyle, it is clear. Some of the traits and thoughts of these UWLs are:</p>

<ul>
<li><p><strong>Going to all of the festivals and concerts that the city offers.</strong> It's all about experience and living in the moment, so why not go to all of these events in order to drink heavily and take drugs? It's what I'm told is 'cool', and since I'm a conformist if I don't do it than I must not be cool.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Working for the weekend. The weekend is a time to get smashed with your boys at the bar.</strong> Spending $50+ on drinks is totally acceptable. I mean you slaved away all day in an office job that you don't like, so why not?</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Staying out late to pick up chicks.</strong> No, you're not looking for a girlfriend (or a wife, lol) as that's too expensive and would be an actual responsibility, and  you're not about that life. But, Hollywood movies and T.V. shows have taught you that you should have as much sex as possible, and if you're not than you are missing out in life.</p></li>
<li><strong>Staying out late to hook up with guys.</strong> You're a college educated, empowered single woman with her own job and apartment. The Hollywood movies, T.V. shows, and celebrity gossip all encourage hooking up with random guys, so it must be acceptable and normal. If you aren't doing this than something must be wrong with you. 
Getting drunk and hooking up with random guys is a normal thing, <strong>you are told.</strong> </li>
</ul>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/Ultrafest-twins-2.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose">
<em>Girls: You're not cool if you're not dressing like this and grinding with random guys at concert festivals</em></p>

<p>If you've ever been to college, especially a big one, you will notice something about the above. This thought process and lifestyle is almost exactly the way college kids are told to live, to a T.</p>

<p>Much of the WULs lifestyle is basically an extension of adolescence. </p>

<p>The definition of adolescence is as follows:</p>

<p><em>the period following the onset of puberty during which a young person develops from a child into an adult.</em></p>

<p><strong>The main difference between a child and adult is responsibility.</strong> A child is usually unable or unwilling to take responsibility for themselves (take care of themselves) or to take responsibility for others.</p>

<p>Living in the moment, for only yourself, is the definition of being a child. </p>

<p>When your whole life revolves around going out on the weekends to binge drink, take drugs, hook up with random people and party, you are not an adult. You might say at least they are responsible and have a job, and to that I say that the job only exists in order to fund their selfish ways.</p>

<p>I haven't even mentioned the high cost of living. By living in these cities and living for the moment, most of these WULs have little to no savings. If you're only purpose is to indulge in bodily pleasures then of course you won't worry about saving much money until you are 'older.' Nevermind that many of them are in their upper 20's and 30's and still living this lifestyle.</p>

<h2 id="whiteurbanliberalsfundculturalmarxistprograms">White Urban Liberals Fund Cultural Marxist Programs</h2>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/CPS-2013-pie-chart3.png" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose">
<em>Chicago Public Schools. Very diverse. Diversity is Our Strength.</em></p>

<p>The majority of government programs don't benefit Whites. Most of the welfare: housing, food stamps, cash payments, after-school programs, etc go to non-Whites.</p>

<p>The majority of government jobs in these urban areas go to non-Whites. Just walk into any city or urban county office and you will easily see 50%+ of the workers being non-White. These jobs pay well, have great benefits, and pay incredible pensions (so much so that major cities are bankrupting themselves to pay $50,000+ pensions for people who no longer work). </p>

<p>As WULs are the majority of the productive class in these cities, we can see that <strong>they are the main financiers of these Cultural Marxist programs.</strong>  </p>

<p>Why are they living this lifestyle? Why are they simply living in the moment and not planning for a future?</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/means.1--1-.gif" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose">
<em>Mexicans are just taking the welfare that Whites refuse to take</em></p>

<h2 id="whiteurbanliberalslackpurpose">White Urban Liberals Lack Purpose</h2>

<p>Let me reiterate: WULs are conformists. When you conform, you just accept what is 'popular' as what is right. Most of us were not conformists and were able to find and seek truth, instead of just believing what we were told to believe.</p>

<p>Since they are conformists, they believe in whatever purpose they are told to pursue. </p>

<p>What is the purpose that our great gatekeepers of the culture tell us?</p>

<ul>
<li>Experience matters most; live in the moment</li>
<li>You're only going to be in your 20's once, so enjoy it as much as you can (which by 'enjoy' is defined as seek immediate gratification)</li>
<li>Serious girlfriends/boyfriends, wives/husbands, and children are a burden and not necessary to 'enjoy' your life</li>
<li>Drugs and sex are liberation. Family and traditional culture is oppression</li>
<li><strong>The pursuit of pleasure is the purpose of life</strong></li>
</ul>

<p>The above is actually a list of no purpose. Your purpose cannot be to simply fulfill immediate gratification for your senses. There has to be something more.</p>

<p><img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/degernate-festivals-1024x817.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose"></p>

<p>Many of us have come from, or lived a  college/urban lifestyle. We have recognized its folly and have made changes in our life to find our purpose.</p>

<p><strong>What is our purpose?</strong></p>

<p>Many of us, after finding truth and seeing the  reality of our world, have come to find a similar purpose for our life.</p>

<p>Roughly speaking: <strong>Our purpose is to find a way to continue our way of life. Our purpose is to find a way for the continued existence of our people.</strong> </p>

<p>We know that in order to achieve our purpose, if we really are serious about it, we need to make  positive changes in our lives. Our Cultural Marxist brainwashing may still have some effect on us; where we view some of these things to be 'uncool.' I myself still have to deal with it, as the programming goes deep. But, we all need to push forward.</p>

<p>We need to make positive changes in our lives, such as :</p>

<ul>
<li>Realizing that life isn't simply about what gives us pleasure; that is, what feels good only in this moment.</li>
<li>Realizing that there is something greater than ourselves to work towards, to fight for, to preserve</li>
<li>Realizing that watching pornography, abusing alcohol, and abusing drugs harms us in our goals and life purpose</li>
<li>Realizing that a P.U.A. lifestyle is one of pleasure seeking, and one that actually harms both us and our own women</li>
<li><strong>Realizing that we may need to sacrifice and plan for the future</strong> 
<img src="http://therightstuff.biz/content/images/2016/12/change_yourself_first_650x255.jpg" alt="How To Save The White Urban Liberals: Give Them Purpose"></li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Changing yourself isn't easy. I'm not going to sugarcoat it.</strong> </p>

<p>In fact, it can be extremely difficult. The only way that I've made sustained changes in my life is <strong>when I had an overriding purpose to pursue.</strong> Do you have a purpose in your life; are you working towards something greater than yourself? If yes, we all need to make changes in order to pursue and ultimately accomplish our goals in life. </p>

<p>It's hard enough to change ourselves, let alone other people. But, <strong>the best way to change others is to change yourself</strong> for the better, first and foremost.</p>

<p>When others see you as a mentally and physically strong, determined, and purpose driven person, they will respect you. They might begin to question what they themselves are doing with their own lives. <strong>THAT</strong> is how you encourage others to change their own behavior. <strong>YOU show them</strong> how it is done, so they know it is possible and is positive.</p>

<p>The time is now.</p>

<p>Implement and work towards your purpose in life. Always ask yourself, "Is what I'm doing helping me achieve my goals; helping me pursue my purpose?" If no, try to work on it. If yes, keep doing what you're doing and always try to keep improving yourself.</p>

<h4 id="thelastthingineedtosay">The last thing I need to say:</h4>

<p>I want you guys to know this. In order to know where I'm coming from.</p>

<p>Many years ago, I was the typical 'college' kid. </p>

<p>I was a 'cool' kid.</p>

<p>I did party; I did drink heavily.</p>

<p>I did go out and stayed up late in order to try and 'hook up' with random girls.</p>

<p>I did live a selfish lifestyle only for myself and seeking my own pleasure. </p>

<p>That is why I can discuss this topic with such depth. </p>

<p>I've been there. It was because I had no purpose in my life.</p>

<p><strong>But that has all changed now.</strong></p>

<p>Let me tell you this. All of you I've met and interacted with; either in person, via Twitter, in the comment sections, etc. </p>

<p>You are all way 'cooler' and better people than all of my so called 'cool' friends ever were. You know the type; highschool/college athletes. Guys who hooked up with random girls. Guys who went to all the concerts and parties just to do drugs. They are all conformists through and through.</p>

<p><strong>You are not.</strong> You are the type of person I want to interact with and spend my time with. </p>

<p>We seek the truth. We will continue to find it. </p>

<p>I am glad we are on the same side; that we have the same purpose.</p>

<p>The time is now.</p>

<p><strong>Let's go.</strong>  </p>

<p><em>Also published at <a href="http://www.purposetopower.com/" target="_blank">Purpose to Power </a>.</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>