World Control and World Order

The quest for world order, as presently conceived, is foolish and destructive. The European state system, based on a balance of power, put forth at Westphalia after the Thirty Years War was first distorted to apply to the entire world, and then discarded altogether by the hegemonic United States in favor of spreading "universal values" such as liberty, freedom, and democracy. By denouncing pluralism and claiming to have the universal answer to human societies, a new vision of world order was created that was not so much world order as world control. This inherently aggressive ideology, because of its confidence, scope, and vacuousness, is more open to violent collapse than perhaps any ideology in history. World order used to mean balancing competing interests and groups so as to maintain a minimal, or at least bearable, level of violence and prevent catastrophe. It was taken for granted that conflict would occur, so a system was put in place to contain it. These assumptions are now gone. It is thought that all people can be made to have the same interests and that the use of violence can be monopolized by one morally superior, unquestionable authority. This is what I mean by world control, and this is at the heart of the globalist agenda. World control does not allow for disorder, low levels of which are paradoxically a necessity for maintaining a consistent and long-lasting order. Liberalism, mass immigration, cultural destruction, centralization, and international organizations are all characteristics of it and are seen most in the West. When they told us these things were needed for world order, they really meant they are needed for world control.

The European Westphalia and then the global Westphalia (the European vision for its former colonies after relinquishing nominal control) have been replaced by the American-made concept of world control. We are now in a transition stage in which the world ostensibly operates under a Westphalian system, but the West refuses to act in its own interest, instead adopting the doctrine of world control and attempting to bring the non-Western states in. Outside of Europe and its diaspora, the dissemination of the requisite values has proven difficult. Beginning after World War II, the United States began implementing what is usually referred to as globalism—a global network of security and economic partnerships. This was created originally as an alliance system to gain leverage over the Soviet Union. It was decided that the best way to spread the Western alliance system was to spread so-called American or Western values. To this end, all twelve post-World War II presidents have pursued the promotion of peace, progress, equality, and democracy as policy objectives. The results have been poor, with some success in Asia, but not much anywhere else. The arrogance with which they set out blinded them to the fact that no people wants to be under the dominion of a foreign ideology. Though the West saw its value system as universal, the rest of the world saw it as Western.

The post-Cold War period has seen the continuation of this policy with even worse results, the best example of which is George W. Bush. The White House's Security Strategy in 2002 claimed "[There is] a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise." Bush had learned nothing from the previous period, and implemented an even more aggressive foreign policy. The countries Bush targeted, Afghanistan and Iraq, are failing at democratic governance and are affirming their Islamic identities. A resurgent Islam categorically denies all tenets of the American system of world order; Islam is also a universalistic decree and sees no room for another.

The post-Cold War is also the period when third world immigration began to spike massively in the West. As America financed wild expenditures in the non-White world, including foreign aid and war, it also imported these people at unprecedented rates. The act of mass immigration—necessary for the global program—has led to divergent groups clashing in ever closer proximity. The clashes between civilizations which were previously mitigated by geography are now taking place within Western neighborhoods. The ideologies, cultures, and capabilities of the various groups are not compatible, creating parallel societies with disaffected non-Whites angry either that they are unable to meet White standards or that Whites are unwilling to conform or submit to their standards. The hostile foreign population in their midst has caused many Whites to question the values of the regime. An extremely divisive politics has emerged which adds to the destabilization of the affected countries. This sequence highlights world control's biggest issue—its ideological foundation is incorrect. All people are not equal and the "human race" is not a valid political identity or entity.

World control is undesirable and likely impossible. A new concept of world order must be created. This new concept must be racial. Demographics is the most crucial aspect of world order moving forward. The African population explosion, third world migration into the White world, and White demographic decline are going to have a profound effect on the world. A new concept of world order must address the reality and urgency of the situation. Whites must reaffirm their identities against the perverse values of the current regime, as other peoples have done. The biggest contribution the West can make to global stability is to create order within its own territory. Europe and North America are best as strong, dynamic regions dominated by Whites. A world order of strong regional orders or imperial spheres of influence has been proven to be the most stable historically. World order in the modern era failed first by the spread of the Westphalian regional system outside of the European world, and then by the attempt to transition to world control, neither of which non-Europeans accepted. Only by acknowledging the various interests, identities, and capabilities of various peoples can world order be maintained.

To create order in the world, we must create order at home. This means reclaiming our territory for our people. With a vacuum where this once existed, chaos is sure to ensue.

Author image
Political writer on the Alt Right. Twitter: @jaywlorenz