Cuckservatism: Response to Ace

Ace is one of the original edgy libertarians. He recently discovered the trending #cuckservative hashtag on Twitter and wrote up this response. It is fairly uninformed and misses the mark. But since Ace is a serious blogger, I thought he deserved a serious response. The most important thing is to define a cuckservative.

The Definition

A cuckservative is a self-styled "conservative" who will cravenly sell out and undermine his home country's people, culture, and national interest in order to win approval with parties hostile or indifferent to them.

The Platonic form of the cuckservative is the UK's David Cameron, who famously proclaimed that it is England that needs to adapt to Islam and not the other way around. A cuckold is a perfect metaphor for this mewling, loathsome stain of a man.

It's not just one thing. It's not just McConnell selling out his base to lap up donations from Ex-Im Bank beneficiaries. It's not just ¡Jeb! brazenly declaring that Americans need to be replaced by Mexicans because they're a more moral and noble people than us. It's not just Sean Hannity defending Israeli spies. It's not just George W Bush throwing hard-earned American treasure at the HIV-infested toilet of Africa. It's not just Rand Paul's stated desire to return the franchise to millions of black felons who will overwhelmingly use it to vote for more gibsmedat funded by whites.

The idea of amnesty---namely that I, a hard-working, responsible American with no arrest record at all, owe welfare payments, free education, and other "bennies" to foreigners who have no legal right to be here---is rage-inducing enough. Seeing my ostensible defenders in the government bend over backward to make the left like them and justify turning America into a Third World country makes me want to bite my own face off.

The idea that conservatives shouldn't even talk about race is one more way we're cucked. See, the left talks about race all the time. They are explicitly and deliberately organized as a racial grievance party. Each passing year, they become more overtly and brazenly dedicated to punishing and expropriating whites in order to deliver gibsmedat to blacks and Hispanics. And when we complain about the way things are going, we get scolded for being "racist." Holder is right. We are a nation of cowards when it comes to race. We're terrified of speaking out about how black America's problems are most certainly not the fault of the white middle class. We're terrified of talking about what the vast majority of Arabs actually believe. We go into paroxysms of terror if the subject of just why all those Latin American countries are socialist comes up. And God forbid anyone ever, EVER say the two words "white interests" except to say how evil and illegitimate they are.

The Difference

Let me ask you a question, Ace? Have you ever seen a Democrat politician scold his base for using the wrong words and immoral framing to respond to attacks from Republicans?

You know the answer. We all know the answer.

You wrote:

This no more discredits immigration-restrictionism than it does conservatism or Republicanism as a whole; there are no liberals, for example, who would claim that the Democrat party or liberalism is discredited by the loathsome people adjacent to that party or that movement -- Maoists, unrepentant bombers, terrorists, Black Panther cop killers, communists, etc.

They would say "they are fringe; they're not us."

Really? That's what they say?

Where have you been for the last two decades? You really think that the Republican Party would have allowed Paul Ryan's career to survive had he been caught with Third Reich propaganda on his wall? That the Justice Department under a Romney administration would have let KKK voter intimidation slide? That the GOP would have let it slide if Sarah Palin had been caught glad-handing with Timothy McVeigh? Dude, the GOP dutifully lined up to destroy Palin when they realized that those fat, ugly, loathsome Flyover Americans liked her too much.

You know what the Left does with its fringe? They take their side. When the leftist fringe gets into any kind of fight with the right, the mainstream left attacks the right that much harder. When Andrew Breitbart started exposing the rotting, fetid underbelly of the political left, the left acted quickly to destroy his ability to affect the narrative. You didn't see article after article in the NYT about how awful the Weather Underground and 60s radicals were and thank God the modern Democrat Party isn't like that any more. They went radio silence on the left-wing radicals and all guns blazing against the right-wing media.

The Discovery Channel hostage situation is a virtually unknown story because the left suppressed it. The Dylann Roof massacre ended with Republicans lining up to attack and vilify their white, Southern constituents...they were just cucking for the left.


And let's be frank, Ace. Blacks are never going to vote for liberty. The GOP loves to point to its sterling record of supporting and improving black civil rights from 1865 through Eisenhower. The Democrats blast them with gibsmedat in 1965...and well, we see where their loyalties lie.

And no, neither will Hispanics. The reason every Latin American country is socialist is because Hispanics want socialism.

The simple fact is any meritocratic society will disproportionately benefit whites and Asians. Period. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, repopulating America with Third Worlders will not create a first-world society no matter how many Ayn Rand tracts you hand out.

This is an IQ map of the world. Bluer is smarter. Redder is dumber.

The Democrat Party is now an explicitly anti-white party. If they're going to attack us, and we're not going to fight back, what exactly do you think is going to happen?

Author image
Hateful Heretic is a jerk.