Today’s subject comes from townhall.com.
Starting with the opening lines of the article, we are shown precisely why the modern conservative is so thoroughly hopeless:
College classrooms are supposed to be politically neutral, not indoctrination centers for liberalism. Yet, we have conservative parents who save money for decades to send their children to universities that teach everything conservatives believe is wrong.
Leave it to a conservative to think something like “political neutrality” could ever exist within institutions that receive funds from a political entity. Leave it to the conservative to believe such neutrality can even be possible, that language is not itself a form of indoctrination, a means to mold and direct belief.
Aren’t you supposed to be the demographic that goes to Church? Low-church or not, you should know the ultimate purpose of language.
At least the author here admits that the liberal has a better grasp of language and religion, that conservative doublethink won’t hold well against The Synagogue’s indoctrination program. The best a conservative parent can hope for is that their child will get in with the libertarian crowd, and hopefully not the C4SS-type.
You can always assuage your butthurt with a call to the local talk station; they’ll understand.
Townhall’s article asserts that university professors are molding/warping young minds into revolutionaries. According to their argument, the country is supporting an educational system that produces people who want to destroy it. Conservatives should therefore fight (petition) these revolutionaries who want to overthrow the system. So conservatives can preserve a system that produces what undermines them. Wait a minute.
The conservative argument doesn’t provide a real answer. This is because conservatives are half of an ideology. This is because the American right has never really been right-wing.
Conservative thought is less of an opposition, and more of a dance partner for the left. The conservative provides the argumentation supporting the liberal ethics.
This is dildos, and anyone who desires to actually oppose this insane world is going to have to approach the issue differently. Utilizing our argumentation style, let us undermine with agreement. Here goes:
The university does exist as an indoctrination center for leftist thought. They do this to maintain social cohesion. If anything, the university exists as a means to preserve the power structure.
If anything, the university professor is the more competent social conservative.
With our approach framed thusly, let us re-consider the quotes presented in the Townhall article.
Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents. –Bill Ayers (University of Illinois-Chicago)
Strong words, certain to offend more delicate sensibilities and stimulate profound thoughts from his classroom. I’m sure the murder rate in Chicago was impacted by the addiction of these radicalized and primarily white students as well. Maybe this white murder epidemic will finally silence those pesky race realists and their even more pesky demographics.
I live to harass white folks. –Derrick Bell (Harvard)
Good for you, Professor-Uncle Tom. Whatever would the Western plantation do without you in the house keeping our children in line?
As to those in the World Trade Center… Let’s get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. …If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I’d really be interested in hearing about it. –Ward Churchill (University of Colorado at Boulder)
If the culture was what he pretended it was, his head would be on a pike. Instead he is protected in a position of relative prestige and importance. Funny, that.
Fact of the matter is, these professors are more likely to inspire a listener to purchase an Apple product than to construct an explosive device.
This is because any capable human mind can pick up the underlying bullshit of what is presented to them. Here is someone paid by the state, telling you to revolt against it. What is this, a sting operation?
I am reminded of those awful shows on Nickelodeon, where the adults are the children and the children are the adults. With no real mentor, just a caricature of authority, you have nothing to surpass, nothing to live up to. Leftist professors therefore inoculate their students from entertaining revolutionary thoughts.
So let us present some actual revolutionary thought, courtesy of TRS:
These overpaid men and women, acting as court jesters for children in our universities, are still more capable at molding opinions than your typical right-winger. Years of church and family are being deconstructed by three hours a week with a stranger: what does this say about your family and church?
Even worse, this contagious liberal narrative ultimately provides no answer for the problems they criticize.
Together, the conservative and liberal argumentation ethic provides distraction, and nothing else. There are no ends, only means. What can a man truly live for, if his own beliefs provide nothing and tears down everything endlessly?