You would think a progressive group of egalitarians obsessed with the religion of psychology would recognize the damage their own narrative does to their cause, but the anticipation of intelligence from a secular humanist is always an assumption proven wrong. Nor do we find the ranks of anti-racists and Bleeding Heart Liberals to be the only dwelling places where the official party line is sorely contradicted by the blatant subtext.
In regards to minorities, liberals are fond of encouraging racial pride, a religious like dogma of pure “equality” among all men and women, and an environment designed to herald the achievements of every race and culture. Well, except for one race, that is. The Race That Dare Not Speak Its Name is not actively encouraged to celebrate its achievements and historical legacy, for much the same reasons that speaking the name of Satan was shunned by past generations for fear of drawing his attention. While the “African Americans” have an entire month devoted to their history, those of Caucasian descent are encouraged to jealously chastise their own kin for the slightest hint of “white supremacy,” much as men are made to self-punish their brothers for the sin of sexism. While at first glance a person of crude understandings might consider this to be a simple double-standard, or perhaps even the justice that whites (or shall we say, white males) deserve, a subtle mind can discern there is a deeper reality here that even the most zealous anti-racist has not considered.
Firstly, by encouraging minorities to celebrate their achievements and making it an occasion of special noteworthiness when a black, latino, or woman first holds attains a certain political office, the liberal agenda is telegraphing a very clear message any school child can understand: “Oh you brave little runt, you were able to overcome your severe handicap and rise above the meanness of your circumstances!” Essentially by taking special notice every time a woman gets a job in a certain field or a black man ties his shoelaces correctly, liberals have managed to make the population feel the same exact way about minorities that they do about Special Olympics contestants. Clearly some sets of people need encouragement and recognition every single time they do something right, and another group of people are just naturally going to always succeed and dominate no matter how much public opposition you throw their way. That in fact, is the second tier of the liberal’s hidden subtext: Some folks are HANDICAPPED, and need a little extra help. As one would expect, by singling out the scrawniest runt in the classroom and drawing unnecessary attention to his most meager accomplishments, the liberal agenda has instilled a massive level of resentment in entire segments of the black population. Far from endearing a sense of pride and equality in those mistreated by past generations, instead a profound sense of inequality, contempt, and bitterness has taken its place. Every Martin Luther King Day, a condescending liberal should just say outright: “Look at you darkies, still living on the margins of proper society after all these years. How come you can’t be like your older white brothers, we scorn them relentlessly and make them hate themselves, but they’re still succeeding at everything they do.”
In fact, the reason that abject racial pride is encouraged among blacks and other minorities is precisely because it poses NO THREAT to anyone. After all, they’re just harmless 2nd rate citizens, still worth 3/5ths of a white person after all this time, and can play childish Black Panther games all they want. On the other hand, racial unity among whites is something deserving of pants wetting unholy terror, since everyone on this planet remembers NAZIS. Liberals know that the minorities encouraged to take pride in their race simply don’t have strong enough constitutions to become militant, organized supremacists, since by their own unconscious assessment, most of them are too busy buying chrome wheels and lusting after white female buttocks to get their shit together long enough to even pay the rent on time. As another author has noted, even among libertarians, their implicit racism is obvious anytime they talk about how the minimum wage hurts blacks most, begging the rather obvious question of why black labor cannot command the same pay rate as white labor. Even among the most egalitarian of freedom lovers, the plain assumption is, blacks are on the bottom of the pile. One would be tempted at this point to shake their head at the unconscious damage white “advocates for minorities” are doing here, but blacks themselves are still flocking to the role of house nigger by participating in the silliness of organizations like the NAACP. Only a handful of public black figures are aware enough of the setbacks done by unconscious liberal racism to demand that blacks stand on their own merits.
The final, most hilariously selfdamning plank of the liberal subtext goes like this: “Whites are the dominant race, their accomplishments are simply expected of them, and to temper white hegemony, we must convince whites themselves to do it, because no one else could ever hope to stand in open defiance of them.” Liberals know that minorities could never mount their own version of a socialist revolution. The only avenue left to them is to work on the psychology of whites themselves, and simply get the biggest bullies on the playground to treat the runts nicer. By now everyone understands just how dangerous organized white people are. One might even call them the most deadly force on this entire planet, given the history of white conquests, the millions of dead Jews, and the eager usage of atomic weapons by white Americans. In fact, the very proliferation of white countries over the world speaks to the white appetite for conquest and savagery to anything unable to compete with them. By getting whites to pass laws designed to curb their own excess and cruelty, essentially the liberal egalitarians are acknowledging the supremacy of whites and that they further understand that white hegemons will agree to minor concessions if they don’t sense a true threat to their power. The only option left to them is persuasion, and should the day ever arise when whites truly felt threatened by a nationalistic minority group, they might just remember the Old White Way and completely obliterate the threat in an orgy of violent savagery as they are so fond of doing when challenged. This is why the hyperbolic portrayals of white supremacists that a campaign of “white genocide” is being conducted through subterfuge and interbreeding will never be taken seriously, even if there were truth to them: Whites still see themselves as being unquestionably dominant, and everyone else agrees with them.
The liberals also like to play a more dangerous game by implying that a “culture of white oppression” is the cause of inequality in our society. Naturally many have called their bluff on this and asked if it really is white supremacy that keeps darkie down, or rather widespread black incompetence. Many also recognize the narrative of white oppression further begs the question of how these damn whites got to be in charge in the first place, leading to increasingly more creative attempts by people like Jared Diamond to postulate white hegemony is solely the result of accidental environmental factors. In both cases you will see concerted attempts to explain away white dominance as being the result of anything BUT something common to whites themselves. When one observes a fairly equal competition and notices one group winning constantly, it is logical to assume the winners have a superior strategy, skill or dedication, not that Fortune simply smiles on them every time. (One could only assume liberals think auto-racing is settled purely by who has the fastest car.) Furthermore, if we accept the egalitarian view that all men are more or less equal in terms of individual ability, we would naturally want to know what “tricks” the whites have discovered that keep them on top. Ironically though, the very things that would truly enable minorities to quickly climb the socio-economic ladder are kept from them, as the idea of studying “White Tools for Success” is the gravest imaginable heresy for social studies. Ironic that the liberal fear of praising whites for anything has both kept the minorities down and actually cemented white hegemony by keeping white tricks in the bag and out of sight. If liberals were not so dogmatically obsessed with forcing the evidence to conform to their party line, these flat Earthers might just discover there isn’t anything intrinsically superior about whites themselves, but there is something intrinsically superior about certain beliefs, memes, cultures, or strategies held mostly by whites.
The secret to changing the outcomes in this game is studying the winners in detail, not encouraging the losers to try harder and the winners to back off.